Tribunal Sets £166/week Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in Northumberland
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £166 per week for a tenant under the Rent Act 1977. The decision took effect on 10 January 2020. The Tribunal noted the kitchen was unmodernised.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under the Rent Act 1977, a tenant is entitled to a fair rent set by the Tribunal, which in this case was £166.00 per week excluding certain costs.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £166.00 per week for an assured tenancy under the Rent Act 1977.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a fair rent of £166 per week for a tenant under the Rent Act 1977, effective from 10 January 2020. The Tribunal considered the condition of the property, particularly noting the kitchen was unmodernised.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AZ/F77/2019/0203
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Northumberland and [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is 166.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 10 January 2020
3. The amount for services is
Per
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order do not apply because 15% exemption.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
Kitchen unmodernised.
[NAME] Date of decision 10.1.20
FR24
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £212.61 Weekly Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £23,040/year fair rent for assured tenancy in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £4104/half-year fair rent for assured tenancy in Lancashire
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £435/month fair rent for assured tenancy in Chigwell
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £106.50 Per Week Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent of £837 per month for tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent of £112.00 per week for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £152 Per Week Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent of £1425 per quarter for tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £1,456 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £490 Per Month Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £40 Per Week Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent set by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No specific factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision set a fair rent of £166.00 per week for an assured tenancy in Northumberland.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was over the fair rent for an assured tenancy in Northumberland.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to set the fair rent at £166.00 per week, excluding water rates and council tax but including fuel charges, based on the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the application of the Rent Act 1977 to determine the fair rent for the assured tenancy.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the fair rent was set according to their request.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
For someone in a similar situation, this means they can seek a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.