VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £4104/half-year fair rent for assured tenancy in Lancashire

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £4104 per half-year for a property under the Rent Act 1977. This means the tenant will pay this amount for rent every six months.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment under the Rent Act 1977, specifically setting the rent at £4104.00 per half year.

Topics

fair renttenancy agreement

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The fair rent for the assured tenancy was set at £4104.00 per half year, excluding certain charges but including others.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a fair rent of £4104 per half-year for a property under the Rent Act 1977. The decision was made on 12 December 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/30UH/F77/2023/0013

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2 Malt Kiln Borwick Carnforth Lancashire [POSTCODE]

J M Going J Gallagher MRICS

Landlord [NAME]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The fair rent is £4104.00 Per Half Year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 12 December 2023

3. The amount for services is Not applicable Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Not Applicable Per

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply because of the 15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry.

None, other than as to the rental period. The most recent Rent Register entry refers to that being a year, whereas the previous rent register entry referred to it as a quarter. The tenant confirmed at the inspection that payments of rent ar4e made every six months.

Chairman J M Going Date of decision 12 December 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was set at £4104.00 for a half-year period.
  • The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 did not apply.
  • The 15% exemption meant the capping provisions did not apply.
  • The tenant confirmed that rent payments are made every six months.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set the fair rent for an assured tenancy at £4104.00 per half-year.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the fair rent amount for an assured tenancy in Carnforth.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the fair rent at £4104.00 per half-year, considering the specific circumstances of the tenancy.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered on the specific circumstances of the tenancy, including the payment schedule and the application of the 15% exemption.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be assessed based on the specific circumstances of their tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.