Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £193.50 Per Week
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property, setting it at £193.50 per week. The decision was made according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, considering the current market conditions and the scarcity of similar properties.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent for their property, which is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, capping it at £193.50 per week.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property at £193.50 per week, capping it according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The decision was based on the current market conditions and the scarcity of similar properties.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AY/F77/2024/0068
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT]
Tenant [APPELLANT] & [NAME]
1. The fair rent is £193.50 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 17 April 2024
3. The amount for services is
Per
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
0.00 Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £240 per week.
Chairman E [NAME] of decision 17 April 2024
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 381
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 292.6
X 381 Minus Y 292.6 = (A) 88.4
(A) 88.4 Divided by Y 292.6 = (B) 0.30212
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.35212
Last registered rent* £143 Multiplied by (C) = 193.35 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 193.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £193.50 Per week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference : LON/00AY/F77/2024/0068
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 4 January 2024
Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 17 April 2024 Hearing
remote on the papers
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no- one requested the same. The documents that I was referred to were in an electronic bundle the contents of which we have recorded. The registered rent with effect from 17 April 2024 is £193.50 per week.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background
1. On 25 October 2023 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £175,12 per week for the above property.
2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £143 per week which had been registered by the rent officer on 16 March 2020 with effect from the same date.
3. On 8 December 2023, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £192 per week with effect from the same date.
4. The tenant objected to the registered rent on 4 January 2024.
5. The tribunal issued Directions on 22 February 2024. No written representations were received from or on nbehalf of either the landlord or the tenant.
6. The tenant has been in occupation since 1976.
7. I have viewed the locality on streetview.
The Evidence
8. The accommodation which comprises three rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc, is on the first and second floors of a converted Victorian house. . [ADDRESS] has parking via permit and is within about a third of a mile of [ADDRESS] station.
The Law
9. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. The Tribunal is unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.
10. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:
That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and
That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables;
adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.
Valuation 11. In the first instance I determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms considered usual for such an open market letting. As no evidence had been provided by either party I relied on my own general knowledge of rental values in [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS] and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £420 per week.
12. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £420 to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £120 to reflect the difference in the terms of the tenancy, the condition of the property, noting that the tenant has provided the white goods carpets and curtains which are usually provided by the landlord on the open market.
13. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £300 per week. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar properties in Greater London and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The uncapped fair rent is £240 per week.
Decision
14. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by me, for the purposes of section 70, is above the maximum fair rent of £193.50 per week calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. Therefore the rent will be capped under the provisions of the Order.
19. Accordingly, the sum of £193.50 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 17 April 2024 being the date of my decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 17 April 2024
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-application-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands- chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the [RESPONDENT] 1988 or the Local Government and [RESPONDENT] 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £640 Per Month Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £249 per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Using Maximum Fair Rent Formula
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Below Maximum Limit
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was capped because the uncapped fair rent was higher than the maximum allowed by the 1999 Order.
- The maximum fair rent was calculated by increasing the previous registered rent by the RPI change and adding 5%.
- The tribunal relied on its general knowledge of rental values to determine the market rent.
- The hypothetical market rent was reduced to account for the tenant providing white goods, carpets, and curtains.
- A 20% deduction was made from the adjusted market rent due to substantial scarcity of similar properties in Greater London.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's application for a fair rent of £175.12 per week was not accepted.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The fair rent for a property was set at £193.50 per week.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, considering the current market conditions and the scarcity of similar properties.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be similarly capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included the current market conditions and the scarcity of similar properties.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
