VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Fair Rent Determination for Regulated Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £208 per week for a tenant's regulated tenancy, considering the property's condition and local market conditions, while accounting for the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market conditions, discounted for scarcity.

Topics

fair rent determinationregulated tenancyscarcity adjustment

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined a fair rent for a regulated tenancy under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £208 per week for a regulated tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and local market conditions, while adjusting for scarcity of similar properties.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BJ/F77/2024/0151

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £208 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 18 June 2024

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 256.50 per week prescribed by the Order.

Chairman E [NAME] of decision 18 June 2024

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 385

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 317.7

X 385 Minus Y 317.7 = (A) 67.3

(A) 67.3 Divided by Y 317.7 = (B) 0.211835

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.261835

Last registered rent* 203 Multiplied by (C) = 256.15 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 256.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £256.50 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference : LON/00BJ/F77/2024/0151

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : Basement flat 139B [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 1 February 2024

Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 18 June 2024 Hearing

remote on the papers

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no-one requested the same. The documents that I was referred to were in an electronic bundle the contents of which we have recorded. The registered rent with effect from 18 June 2024 is £208 per week.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. On 21 November 2023 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £243.60 per week for the above property.

2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £203 per week which had been registered by the rent officer on 10 December 2021 with effect from 9 February 2022.

3. On 16 January 2024, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £214 per week with effect from 9 February 2024.

4. The landlord objected to the registered rent on 1 February 2024.

5. The tribunal issued Directions on 25 April 2024. The tenant sent written representations however no written representations were received from or on behalf of either the landlord.

6. The tenancy commenced on 1 January 1988.

7. I have viewed the locality on streetview.

The Evidence

8. The property is a basement flat within a converted Victorian terrace house on a main road. Local shops are within easy walking distance, Southside shopping centre is approximately one third of a mile and the station three quarters of a mile distant. The accommodation comprises two rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc, the tenant has use of the garden.

9. The tenant stated that there are extensive areas of damp within all rooms in the flat; plus additional damp in the kitchen following a leak from above, the wc is cracked and the wall tiles are coming off the wall in the bathroom. The landlord had installed a new boiler several years ago. There was a lack of insulation between the flat and the floor above causi n g noise nuisance: the upper floor is not carpeted. The tenant has provided the carpets, curtains and white goods.

The Law

10. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under

the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. The Tribunal is unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.

11. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:

That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and

That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.

Valuation 12. In the first instance I determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms considered usual for such an open market letting. As no evidence had been provided by either party I relied on my own general knowledge of rental values in Southfields and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £350 per week.

13. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £350 to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £90 to reflect the condition of the flat and the terms of the tenancy including the tenant’s carpets, curtains and white goods.

14. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £260 per week. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar properties in Greater London and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The uncapped fair rent is £208 per week.

Decision

15. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by me, for the purposes of section 70, is below the maximum fair rent of £256.50 per week calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. Therefore, the rent will not be capped under the provisions of the Order.

19. Accordingly, the sum of £208 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 18 June 2024 being the date of my decision.

Chairman: [NAME]: 18 June 2024

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application- for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that considers the property's condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects market conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent discounted for scarcity.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The tenant is entitled to a capped fair rent according to statutory formulas.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent of £208 per week for a regulated tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition, local market conditions, and scarcity of similar properties.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the property's condition and local market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and local market conditions mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.