VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £200 per week for a property in London. They considered the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market rent adjusted for the property's condition and scarcity in the area.

Topics

fair rent determinationrent act 1977valuation of property

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the property's condition and market scarcity.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £200 per week for a property located in London, taking into account the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AN/F77/2022/0105

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 76 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord

[RESPONDENT] and [COMPANY]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £200.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 23 August 2022

3. The amount for services is N/A Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf) 7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £207.50 per week prescribed by the Order.

Chairman E [NAME] of decision 23 August 2022

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 340

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 294.2

X 340 Minus Y 294.2 = (A) 45.8

(A) 45.8 Divided by Y 294.2 = (B) 0.155676

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.205676

Last registered rent* £172 Multiplied by (C) = £207.38 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £207.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £207.50 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference : JM/LON/00AN/F77/2022/0105

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : [ADDRESS] W12 0js

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 27 June 2022

Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] [NAME] and venue of : 23 August 2022 hearing

remote hearing on the papers

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

The registered rent with effect from 23 August 2022 is £200 per week.

This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE, a paper determination which is not provisional. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all the issues could be determined on the papers. The documents that the tribunal were referred to are in a bundle, the contents of which have been recorded.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. On 3 May 2022 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £199.52 per week for the above property.

2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £172 per week which had been registered by the rent officer on 15 July 2020 with effect from the same date.

3. On 16 June 2022, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £204.50 per month with effect from 15 July 2022.

4. On 27 June 2022 the tenant objected to the registered rent.

5. Owing to the Covid 19 restrictions the parties were asked if they would consent to the application being dealt with on the papers. Neither party objected. Written representations were received from the tenant no representations were received from or on behalf of the landlord.

The Evidence

6. [ADDRESS] is a tree lined residential street with on street permit parking situated in the Shepherd’s Bush area close to all local facilities. The property comprises a ground floor flat in a two storey terraced building. The accommodation comprises four rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc.

7. Mr [APPELLANT] has been in occupation since June 1972. He has installed double glazing and central heating and provided the carpets curtains and white goods. Mr [APPELLANT] further stated that the landlord had not undertaken any expenditure on the property.

8. He was of the opinion that the increase of £32 per week was excessive.

The Law

9. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect if any of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.

10. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:

That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and

That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.

Valuation

11. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. The Tribunal relied on its own general knowledge of rental values in Shepherd’s Bush and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £500 per week.

12. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £500 per week to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). The Tribunal noted that properties available on the open market were modern or modernised, with white goods, floor and window coverings. The Tribunal considered that these differences, the lack of modernisation together with the terms and conditions of the tenancy required a deduction of £250 per week.

13. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £250 per week. The Tribunal was of the opinion that there was substantial scarcity in London for similar properties and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The Tribunal’s uncapped fair rent is £200 per week.

Decision

14. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was accordingly £200 per week this is below the maximum fair rent of £207.50 per week which can be charged under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

14. Accordingly, the sum of £200 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 23 August 2022 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.

Chairman: [NAME]: 16 August 2022

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

ii. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

iii. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

iv. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent reflecting the current market conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted for the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that considers the condition of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a maximum fair rent as defined by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent of £200 per week for a property in London.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The scarcity of similar properties in the area was a key factor in the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the scarcity of similar properties in their area when arguing for a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence about the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.