First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Based on Rent Act 1977
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The Tribunal took into account the condition and state of repair of a person, as well as the local rental market conditions.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the condition and terms of a person, adjusted for inflation and local market conditions.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The Tribunal inspected the property and considered the condition, age, and state of repair of the premises, as well as the local rental market conditions.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AZ/F77/2023/0335
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 33A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge [NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £228.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 22 January 2024
3. The amount for services is N/A Per
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
N/A Per
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £240 per week.
Chairman Judge B MacQueen Date of decision 22 January 2024
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 377.3
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 308.6
X 377.3 Minus Y 308.6 = (A) 68.7
(A) 68.7 Divided by Y 308.6 = (B) 0.223
First [NAME] for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.273
Last registered rent* 179.00 Multiplied by (C) = 227.80 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £228.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £228.00 Per week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present [NAME] was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent [NAME] since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the [NAME] of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AZ/F77/2023/0335
Property : 33A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 2 October 2023
Type of [NAME] : Section 70, Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Judge B [NAME], MRICS
Decision
: 22 January 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The sum of £ 228.00 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 22 January 2024, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
REASONS
Background
1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.
2. On 17 July 2023 the Landlord made an [NAME] to register the rent of [NAME] at £434 per week.
3. On 12 September 2023 the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £226 per week with effect from 10 October 2023.
4. This was in lieu of the previous registered rent of £179 per week from 10 October 2021.
5. The Tenant objected on 2 October 2023, and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal, Property Chamber.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 8 November 2023. Parties were requested to complete a pro-forma supplying details of the accommodation on a room-by-room basis, the features of [NAME] (central heating, white goods, double glazing, carpets and curtains) and other property attributes and any further comments that they may wish the Tribunal to take into consideration. This could include any repairs and improvements that have been made, any comments on the condition of [NAME] and rentals of similar properties – should they wish to rely on these.
[NAME]
7. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of [NAME] on 22 January 2024. Mr [RESPONDENT] was present but the landlord was not present or represented.
8. [NAME] is a 1st floor self-contained flat of brick construction with a tiled roof.
9. The Tenants installed the central heating and hot water cylinder and the curtains, carpets and white goods that are at [NAME]. The Landlord installed double glazing in 2021.
10. [NAME] comprised five rooms, 1 kitchen, 1 bathroom/wc. There was also a garden which is shared with the ground floor flat ([ADDRESS]).
3
11. The room that the Tenants used as the kitchen does not have a sink. There is a sink in the room that the Tenants described as the utility room. This sink was installed by the Tenants. There are no worksurfaces, or kitchen units provided by the Landlord. Instead, the Tenants use an old Formica top table and a microwave that is on top of two large cardboard boxes.
12. In the bathroom there was a super steel bath and bath shower mixer tap that had been installed by the Tenants. The Tenants had also replaced an old cast iron high level W.C cistern with a new low level slim panel cistern. There was no handbasin in the bathroom and the Tenants have to use the sink that is in the utility room.
13. In one room there was a hole in the ceiling and the decoration throughout [NAME] was tired.
The law
14. The relevant law is set out in section 70 of the 1977 Act and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The Tribunal is to have regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to the age, character, locality and state of repair of [NAME]. The Tribunal is to disregard the effect on the rental value of any improvements carried out by the tenant (other than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy). The Tribunal is also required (by s.70(2)) to assume that the demand for similar rented properties in the locality does not significantly exceed the supply of such properties for rent; in effect, if such scarcity exists, the Tribunal will adjust the rental figure so that the fair rent is not affected by it.
15. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92, the Court of Appeal confirmed that for the purposes of determining the market rent (before [NAME] any necessary adjustments), open market assured tenancy rents are usually appropriate comparables.
16. By section 72 of the 1977 Act, if the rent is determined by the Tribunal, the registration of the rent takes effect from the date the Tribunal makes its decision.
Representations - Tenants
17. The Tribunal considered the written submissions provided by the Tenants.
4 18. In their letter dated 2 December 2023 the Tenants requested an inspection and set out their representations. The Tenants confirmed that they had lived at [NAME] for over 36 years and there had been no internal modernisation improvements during that time, apart from an electrical consumer unit upgrade, electrically wired smoke and carbon monoxide detectors installed and electrical installation safety inspections.
19. The Tenants also stated that the Landlord had completed only essential repairs, which included installation of double glazing in June 2021 because the old windows had become so rotten that most could not be opened.
20. The Tenants stated that the most important basis of their objection to the newly registered rent was that [NAME] had no kitchen units or worktops and there is no sink in the room that the Tenants use as a kitchen.
21. The Tenants explained that they had installed the central heating system at their own expense in 1988 by installing a boiler, 11 radiators and all the pipework. The Tenants also installed a new Baxi Solo 3 Gas boiler in 2004 and replaced 8 of the conventional radiators with new convector radiators, again at their own expense.
22. Again at their own expense, the Tenants installed a new hot water cylinder in 2002 to replace an old galvanised steel hot water tank that the Tenants believed was approximately 70 years old.
23. The Tenants submit that a weekly rent of £150.00 per week would be more in line with the unmodernised condition of [NAME], the lack of a kitchen and lack of heating provided by the landlord.
Representations – Landlord
24. No representations were received from the Landlord.
Determination
25. First, the Tribunal needs to determine the rent which the Landlord could reasonably expect to obtain for [NAME] in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms now usual for open market lettings.
26. Neither party has supplied comparables. The Rent Officer determined the uncapped rent at £ 375 per week. The tribunal is of the opinion that, given the attractive location of this Property, this valuation is low. Using its knowledge and experience the Tribunal estimated that the open market rent is in the region of £500 per week.
5
27. The Tribunal then needs to adjust this open market rent to reflect that the Landlord has not provided carpets, curtains, kitchen units and white goods, and the tenants provision of the central heating and hot water, bath and replacement sink and cistern.
28. For this the Tribunal has made an adjustment of £200 per week to arrive at a rent before consideration of scarcity of £300 per week.
29. The Tribunal then considered whether there should be an adjustment for scarcity (as referred to in paragraph 14 (above)) and decided that there should be an adjustment of 20%. This results in a rent of £240 per week.
30. The provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 require that the registered rent is the lower of either the capped fair rent, details of which are attached to this Decision, or the fair rent decided by the Tribunal, as set out above.
31. The capped fair rent is £228 per week (see attached Notice). This is lower than the rent assessed by the Tribunal as set out above and therefore the rent of £228 per week is to be registered.
Name: Judge B MacQueen
Date: 22 January 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision on a point of law to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
6 If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at Maximum Level Under Rent Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Capped Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £265.50 as fair rent for protected tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent at £195 per week under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Tenant Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was capped by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, which resulted in a lower registered rent.
- The Tribunal adjusted the open market rent to account for the landlord not providing certain items.
- The Tribunal adjusted the open market rent to account for the tenants providing certain items.
- An adjustment for scarcity was applied to the rent.
- The Tribunal used its own knowledge and experience to estimate the open market rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's application to register the rent at £434 per week was not accepted.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord, with the First-tier Tribunal making the determination.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the condition and state of repair of the property, as well as the local rental market conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition and state of repair of the property, as well as the local rental market conditions.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and state of repair of their property, as well as the local rental market conditions, when determining a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence and documents related to the condition and state of repair of the property, as well as local rental market conditions, were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
