VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Kensal Rise Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the fair rent for a flat in the address after considering various factors such as market conditions and the state of the property, but not including any improvements made by the tenant. The decision reflects the balance between what is reasonable for both the landlord and the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market value while disregarding any tenant-improvements or disrepair attributable to the tenant.

Topics

tenancyfair rent determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a flat in the address, London, considering various factors including market conditions and property improvements.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a flat in Kensal Rise, London. The tribunal considered market conditions and property improvements while disregarding any tenant-improvements or disrepair attributable to the tenant.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON00AS/F77/2025/0323

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT]

Tenant Mr S [APPELLANT] &[APPELLANT] & Miss

1. The fair rent is £920 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 21 January 2026

3. The amount for services is not applicable £ Per

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 because it is below the maximum fair rent of £948 per month prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 21 January 2026

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 405.6

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 376.6

X 405.6 Minus Y 376.6 = (A) 29

(A) 29 Divided by Y 376.6 = (B) 0.077

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.127

Last registered rent* £841 Multiplied by (C) = £947.80 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £948

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £948 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference : LON/00AE/F77/2025/0323

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 25 October 2025

Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 21 January 2026 Hearing remote on the papers

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

This has been a hearing on the papers which has not been objected to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because, no-one requested the same and I determined that the matter could be dealt with on the papers. The documents which I was referred to were in a bundle the contents of which I have recorded. The registered rent with effect from 21 January 2026 is £920 per month.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. On 1 September 2025 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £1000 per month for the above property.

2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £841 per month which had been registered by the Tribunal on 1 August 2023 with effect from the same date.

3. On 6 October 2025, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £910 per month with effect from the same date.

4. The tenant objected to the registered rent on 25 October 2025.

5. The tribunal issued Directions on 26 November 2025. The landlord made written representations, the tenant’s representations were in his objection letter.

6. The subject comprises a second floor flat above commercial premises close to [ADDRESS] underground station and on a bus route. The accommodation comprises two rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc. The flat is double glazed but not centrally heated. Access appears to be from the rear. Curtains, floor covering and white goods are the tenant’s.

The Evidence

7. The landlord was of the opinion that the rent increase was reasonable. The loft had been insulated in 2020.

8. The tenant noted that the rent officer had not inspected prior to carrying out his valuation. He provided photographs of a repair to the ceiling where only the area of the replacement plaster had been repainted. He considered the increase excessive.

The Law

9. When determining a fair rent I, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. I also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. I am unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.

10. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:

That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of

similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and

That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.

Valuation 11. In the first instance I determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms considered usual for such an open market letting. As neither party provided any rental evidence I relied on my own general knowledge of rents within [ADDRESS] and concluded that if the flat was in the condition usually found on the open market it would let for £1650 per month.

12. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £1650 per month to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £500 to reflect the lack of central heating, modernisation, floor coverings, curtains and white goods and difference in terms and conditions.

13. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £1150 per month. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar sized properties in Greater London and therefore made a deduction of approximately 20% for scarcity. The uncapped fair rent is £920 per month.

Decision

14. The uncapped fair rent initially determined for the purposes of section 70, is below the maximum fair rent of £948 per month calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. Therefore, the rent will not be capped under the provisions of the Order.

15. Accordingly, the sum of £920 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 21 January 2026 being the date of my decision.

Chairman: [NAME]: 21 January 2026

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.

If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-application-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands- chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant's rent is capped at the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The tenant's rent reflects the property's condition and market value.
  • The tenant's rent is set based on market conditions and specific property characteristics.
  • The tenant's rent is adjusted for improvements made by the tenant.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's entitlement to a fair rent is based on market conditions and statutory provisions.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £920 per month for a flat in the address, London.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute over the fair rent of the property.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal considered market conditions and the state of repair of the property while disregarding any improvements made by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied in determining the fair rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about market conditions and property improvements without considering tenant-improvements or disrepair was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant, as they objected to a higher rent but it was set at £920 per month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a fair rent determination should consider market conditions and property state while disregarding any improvements made by them.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property's condition and written representations from both parties were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, an application for permission to appeal can be made within 28 days if there is a point of law at issue.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.