VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Below Maximum Limit

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent of £171 per week for a rented property. The decision was made after considering comparable evidence and local rental values, and it was noted that this rent is below the maximum fair rent allowed under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal, which may be lower than the maximum fair rent allowed under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

tenancy disputesfair rent determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £171 per week for a property, noting that the rent is below the maximum fair rent allowed under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £171 per week for a property, noting it's below the maximum fair rent allowed under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The decision was based on comparable evidence and the general knowledge of rental values in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/45UH/F77/2024/0616

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Mr I [NAME] Mr M [NAME] Judge Rai

Landlord The Hyde Group

Tenant [NAME]

1. The fair rent is £171.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 10 February 2025

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £209.00 per week prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Mr I [NAME] of decision 10 February 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 392.10

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 252.10

X 392.10 Minus Y 252.10 = (A) 140.00

(A) 140.00 Divided by Y 252.10 = (B) 0.5553

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999? NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) n/a

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.6053

Last registered rent* £130 Multiplied by (C) = £208.69 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £209.00

Variable service charge? NO If YES add amount for services n/a

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £209.00 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/45UH/F77/2024/0616 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Ms [COUNSEL] :

None

Landlord : The Hyde Group Representative : None Type of Application :

Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.

Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] Judge C Rai Date of Objection : 25th November 2024 Date of Decision and Summary Reasons :

10th February 2025

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £171 per week with effect from 10th February 2025.

HAV/45UH/F77/2024/0616 2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 16th September 2024 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for the registration of a new rent for the property in accordance with Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The rent was previously registered at £130 per week on 28th November 2013 following a determination by the Rent Officer. £6.02 per week was noted as being attributable to services.

3. On 4th November 2024 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £171 per week to take effect from 4th November 2024. £19.82 was noted as being attributable to services.

4. On 25th November 2024 the Tenant objected to this new rent and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property), formerly a Rent Assessment Committee. Inspection 5. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

6. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by both the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation 7. Having consideration to the comparable evidence provided and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1,000 per calendar month. Rents are normally expressed as a monthly figure. This includes a reduction to discount various Tenant’s improvements.

8. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord and the Landlord would also be responsible for internal repair and decoration.

9. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods, carpets and curtains all supplied so some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. The Tribunal has also made adjustments for the Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration and the dated kitchen and bathroom fittings.

HAV/45UH/F77/2024/0616 3 10. The Tribunal noted the number of properties with similar accommodation within a reasonable distance of the property that are available to rent and decided that no deduction for scarcity should be made. 11. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £1,000 Less deductions for:- Tenants’ liability for internal decoration

£50 Tenant’s provision of white goods

£45 Tenant’s provision of carpets

£50 Tenant’s provision of curtains

£15 Dated kitchen and bathroom

£100

____

Total deduction per month

£260 TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH

£740

12. Having made the adjustments indicated above, the Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was £740 per calendar month which equates to £170.76, rounded to £171 per week.

13. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is below the maximum fair rent of £209 per week permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice, and accordingly we determine that the limit set by the Order does not apply in this case.

14. The Tribunal notes that the rent determined is more than the rent requested in the Landlord’s application. The Landlord is a [NAME] and is not obliged to charge this higher rent.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that includes reasonable service charges.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the lesser of the section 70 rent and the maximum fair rent.
  • The tenant is entitled to have lift costs and depreciation included in the service charge.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects market conditions and the state of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined according to the Retail Price Index and the Rent Act 1977.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £171 per week for a property.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and the general knowledge of rental values in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's value with similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the fair rent was determined to be below the maximum allowed under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also have their fair rent determined based on comparable evidence and local rental values.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and the general knowledge of rental values in the area were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.