Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Based on Condition and Location

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AY/F77/2024/0002

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 29 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The [NAME] is £17,572.00 Per Year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 5th March 2024

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts ([NAME]) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The [NAME] to be registered is the maximum [NAME] as prescribed by the Rent Acts ([NAME]) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £27,648 per year.

[NAME] of decision 5th March 2024

FR24 [NAME] FIGURE X 378.00

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 294.6

X 378.00 Minus Y 294.60 = (A) 84.40

(A) 83.40 Divided by Y 294.60 = (B) 0.2831

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.333

Last registered rent* £13,182.29 Multiplied by (C) = 17571.99 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £17, 572.00

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services no

[NAME] = £17, 572.00 Per year

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum [NAME], in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum [NAME] to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s [NAME] determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum [NAME].

1

Case Reference

: FL/LON/OOAY/F77/2024/0002 Property : 29 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a [NAME] under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] (Hons) MA LLM

FRICS HMCTS Code : Determination on papers Date of Decision : 5th March 2024 Date of Statement of Reasons: 5th March 2024 _______________________________________________

Statement of Reasons

____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

Decision FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

1.The decision of the tribunal is that a [NAME] of £17572.00 per year, is determined with an effective date of 5th March 2024. Background 2. An application was made to re-register a [NAME], dated 4th April 2023, by the landlord of the property [RESPONDENT]. Prior to the application to re- register a [NAME], the Rent Officer had registered a rent of £13898 per year with £715.71 per year for services, included in afore going rent, with effect from 18th January 2021.

3. Subsequently the Rent Officer registered a [NAME] of £18282.50 per year with no services noted included in the foregoing rent, attributed to services with effect from 22nd June 2023.

4. An objection to the registered rent was received, and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property).

5. Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 11th January 2024. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the Property and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. The Property 6. The tribunal did not inspect the property. The property is a self-contained purpose built flat with partial central heating, five rooms, one kitchen / diner, one bath and a WC. The Rent Officer noted that the central heating was installed through the Warm Front scheme initiated by the tenant. Relevant Law 7. Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a [NAME] are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as

3

amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of [NAME] by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a [NAME], confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a [NAME], determine a [NAME] for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of [NAME] (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a [NAME] under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.

(3) There shall be disregarded-

4

(a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”

Consequently, when determining a [NAME] the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the Property. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:

(a) that ordinarily a [NAME] is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be

5

adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject property).

In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent. Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts ([NAME]) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a [NAME] is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Submissions Landlord 8. No submissions from the landlord were received, other than the application to re- register a [NAME] and a completed reply Form. The completed Reply Form noted that the three bedrooms were all double. Also noting that there are no curtains nor carpets or white goods supplied by the Landlord. Tenant 9. The tenant by email to Rent Officer dated 30th November 2023 noted; “I have been living in the flat for over 20 years and they have hardy made any changes to the property. I’ve had a leak in my bathroom for over 15 years and various damp damage and blown single glazed sash windows.” The Determination

6

Reasons for Decision 10. The rent to be determined must reflect the condition found on the date of the hearing disregarding all tenants' improvements.

11. The process for determining a [NAME] is the application of Rent Act 1977 section 70 on the subject property and then comparison with the maximum rent permitted under the [NAME] 1999. This means that comparison with other properties the subject of [NAME] is not material.

12. Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that the rent was £48,000 per year if let on a contemporary assured shorthold basis.

13. The Property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent, therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 20% is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted. The calculation 15. The rent of £48,000 per year is on the basis of an assured shorthold tenancy where the tenant would not be responsible for the service charge. The Rent Officer registered a rent on 18th January 2021 of £13898 pa inc £715.71 pa for services. However, the rent registered 22nd June 2023 had no services noted nor did the application to register the new [NAME] identify any. On this basis the determination below is made on the evidence that the tenant is not responsible for a service charge.

16. The rent prior to adjustment for condition, terms and scarcity. £48,000 per year

7

------------------------

Less 20% condition £9600.00 per year

-------------------------- £ 38,400 per year Less 10% for terms and supplied goods inc white goods £3840 per year ------------------------------------------- £34,560 per year Less 20% for scarcity. £6912 per year ------------------------------------------

17. The rent after this final adjustment was £27,648.00 per year. Rent Acts ([NAME]) Order 1999 18. The rent to be registered is limited by the Rent Acts ([NAME]) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £17572.00 per year. This figure is lower than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments, of £27,648 per year attributed for services.

19.

Accordingly, the sum of £17572.00 per year will be registered as the [NAME] with effect from 5th March 2024, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 5th March 2024 Extended reasons: 5th March 2024

8

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.