VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent for a residential property. They set the rent at £900 per month, considering factors like the property's condition and the retail price index.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a residential property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £900 per calendar month for a residential property under the Rent Act 1977. The decision took into account the retail price index and the condition of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BD/F77/2023/0334

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge I [NAME] MA [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 900.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 15 January 2024

3. The amount for services is

Per

negligible

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

negligible

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None known

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £1079 per week. (b)

Chairman Judge I Mohabir Date of decision 15 January 2024

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 377.3

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 307.4

X 377.3 Minus Y 307.4 = (A) 69.9

(A) 69.9 Divided by Y 307.4 = (B) 0.227391

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.227391

Last registered rent* 845 Multiplied by (C) = 1079.39 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 1079.50

Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1079.50 Per Calendar month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference:

LON/00BD/F77/2023/0334

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant: `

Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord: [APPELLANT] of Objection:

2 October 2023

Type of Application: Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal:

Judge I [NAME] MA MRICS

Date of Summary Reasons:

15 January 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £ 900 per calendar month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 15 January 2024 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the Property, having not been requested to do so, but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 3. Neither the Tenant nor Landlord made written submissions.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the TW12 area of Hampton, we consider that the rent for the Property in its current condition (based on the information contained in the Landlord’s original application for registration of fair rent and the information contained in the Rent Register) and having viewed the property in [ADDRESS] would be of £900 per calendar, which takes into account a reduction for scarcity . It has not been capped under the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rents ) Order 1999.

Chair: Judge I Mohabir

Date: 15 January 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The fair rent is determined by the Tribunal based on the condition and location of the property, adjusted for market conditions and capped by.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent of £900 per calendar month for a residential property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and the retail price index to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need to set a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that is reasonable and reflective of the property's value.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal if there is a dispute over rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The condition of the property and the retail price index were important factors in determining the fair rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court if there are grounds for appeal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get legal advice from a solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.