Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Market Conditions
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property in Harrow. They considered the property's condition, location, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The fair rent was set at £470.88 per month, effective from June 10, 2024.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal considering the property's characteristics and the local housing market conditions.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the property's condition and scarcity in the area.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property located in Harrow, considering the property's condition, location, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The fair rent was set at £470.88 per month, effective from June 10, 2024.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAM/LON/00AQ/F77/2023/0315
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £470.88 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 10th June 2024
3. The amount for services is £83.88 (50%) Per Calendar Month
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
not applicable Per
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £492.08 per month including £83.88 per month (50%) for services (variable).
[NAME] of decision 10th June 2024
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 385
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 278.1
X 385 Minus Y 278.1 = (A) 106.90
(A) 106.90 Divided by Y 278.1 = (B) .03843941
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.4343941
Last registered rent* £269.81 Multiplied by (C) = 1.4343941 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £387.00
Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services £83.88 (50%)
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £470.88 Per Month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference : MAM/LON/00AQ/F77/2023/0315
Hearing Type : [ADDRESS] of Written Representations
Property : 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
Date of Objection : 23 August 2023
Type of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal Member : [NAME], FIRPM
Valuer Chairman
Date of Hearing : 10 June 2024
Date of Full Reasons : 13 June 2024
DECISION
(1) The sum of £470.88 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 10 June 2024 being the date the Tribunal made the decision.
2
REASONS
Background
1. On 9 June 2023 the landlord sent an RR1 application for rent registration of a fair rent to the rent officer. The previous rent was determined by the rent officer on 12th February 2018 at a rent of £269.81 per calendar month. On 31st July 2023 the rent officer registered a fair rent of £444.54 effective from 31st July 2023
2. By way of an email dated 23 August 2023 the landlord queried the calculation of the service charge element of the registered rent and thus the level of the registered rent itself.
3. The Valuation Officer subsequently made an application to the Tribunal on 30 August 2023 for the determination of the fair rent.
4. On 18th October 2023 the Tribunal issued directions to the parties requiring them to produce any evidence on which they wished to rely in support of their respective cases including by use of a reply form. The matter was set down for determination on the papers unless either party requested a hearing which neither party did. The landlord was directed to return the reply form with any documents upon which it wished to rely by 1 November 2023. The tenant was directed to do likewise by 15 November 2023 with the landlord given a further opportunity to respond by 22 November 2023.
5. Neither party took the opportunity to make submissions; although the Tribunal has had sight of the landlord's email dated 23 August 2020 and a copy of a [RESPONDENT] Group document titled; Summary of Actual Service Charge, in which details of the service charge are provided.
6. The Tribunal has also had sight of a tenancy document dated 26th May 2024 in which clause 1(2) of Schedule 4 states that the tenancy is a shared ownership tenancy with the tenant having an ownership of 50%.
7. Further, by way of clause 7 (2) – (4) inclusive it is stated that the rent is to include a variable service charge element.
8. Having regard to the landlord's letter dated 23 August 2023 and the Summary of Actual Service Charge, the Tribunal has concluded that there are two distinctive elements to the service charge.
3
9. The charge for ongoing services , which is understood to total £80.77 per month made up as follows:
a) £ 17.00 per month management; b) £ 8.33 per month insurance and the remaining c) £ 55.02 per month general services.
10. In addition to the £80.77per month, there is a further sum of £87.00 per month payable by way of a sinking fund.
11. These combine to make a total monthly service charge of £167.77 per month
12. It is noted that the tenant's repairing liability within the terms of the tenancy are: To repair and paint the interior of the property as specifically defined in Clauses 3 ( 3) & (4)
13. On 10 June 2024 on the basis of papers and without a hearing, the Tribunal determined the fair rent of the above property at £984.17 including £167.77 service charge.
The Law
14. When determining a fair rent, the tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1988 section 70, had regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property. Section 70 is set out in the appendix below.
15. In [COMPANY] versus Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Tribunal (1995) 24HLR 107 and Curtis versus London Rent Assessment Tribunal (1999) QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity (i.e. that element of any of the market rent that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and that for the purpose of determining market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables (these rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
4
The Property
16. From Google Maps and information included on the rent register as well as information provided by the parties, the tribunal found as follows:
(a) The property comprises a one bedroom purpose built flat in a small three storey block. (b) From the rent register the accommodation is understood to comprise : lounge, bedroom, kitchen, bathroom/WC.
Valuation
17. From [COMPANY] vs Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Tribunal, other registered rents are not relevant as a starting point because they are not market rents.
18. The Tribunal must first determine the market rent for the property of this size, in this location and in its current condition. It must also disregard the personal circumstances of either party. The Tribunal notes that the rent officer adopted a starting point of £1,200.00 per month. Using its own general knowledge of the Greater London property market, the Tribunal disagrees with the rent officer and considers that the market rent for the property of this size, in this location and in good condition with the usual white goods, carpets and decorated to a good standard, would be £1,300.00 per month. However, all white goods, carpets and curtains are presumed to be the property of the tenant. In addition, a tenant of a Rent Act property has more onerous repairing obligations than those under an assured shorthold tenancy. The Tribunal therefore made the following deductions from the market rent of £1,300.00 per month.
Market rent £1,300 per month
Less deductions for: • Tenant’s repairing liability • no white goods • the provision of carpets and curtains; • unmodernised kitchen
Less 21.5% = £ 279.50 per month
5
Adjusted rent = £1,020.50 per month
19. The Tribunal found that there was substantial scarcity in the locality of Greater London having taken judicial notice of long housing association and local authority waiting lists in Greater London. It therefore made a deduction in respect of scarcity of 20% (£204.10 per month) from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. This left the final rental figure of £816.40 per month.
20. The Tribunal is then required to apply the Rent Act (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The calculation was included on the decision sheet and produced a maximum fair rent of £816.40 per month , plus services of £167.77 per month totaling £984.17 per month .
21. This figure is then adjusted to reflect proportional ownership
£984.17 pm
X 50% £492.08 pm
22. The Tribunal must register the lower of the adjusted market rent or maximum fair rent as the fair rent of the property. In this instance, the Adjusted market rent produces a higher figure and the Tribunal therefore registered the rent at £470.88 per month with effect from 10 June 2024 being the date of the Tribunal decision.
Name: [NAME] Chairman
Date: 13 June 2024
6
APPENDIX
Rent Act 1977
Section 70 Determination of Fair Rent
(1) In determining, for the purpose of this part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwellinghouse, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and, in particular, to –
(a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwellinghouse…F1
(b) if any furniture is provided for use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture (F2 and)
(c) (F2(c)) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy)
(2) For the purpose of the determination, it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in the locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.
(3) There shall be disregarded:
(a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any [NAME] to comply with any terms thereof;
(b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy; by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any [NAME];
(c) (d)………………………………………………………………………F3
(d) If any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any [NAME] in [NAME] of theirs or, as the case may be, any deterioration
7
in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with them, or any sub-tenant of theirs.
(e) F4 [(3a) in any case where under Part 1 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a superior landlord is liable to pay Council Tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, regard shall also be had to the amount of Council Tax which, as at the date on which the application to the rent officer was made, was set by the billing authority –
(a) for the financial year in which that application was made, and
(b) for the category of dwelling within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date,
but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of Council Tax payable shall be disregarded.
(3b) In subsection (3a) above –
“hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part 1 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992.
“billing authority” has the same meaning as in that part of the Act, and
“category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in Section 30(1) and (2) of that Act.]
(4) In this section “improvement” includes the replacement of any fixture or fitting.
[F5 (4a) in this section “premium” has the same meaning as in part IX of this Act and “sum in the nature of a premium” means –
(a) any such loan as is mentioned in Section 119 or 120 of this Act,
(b) any such excess over the reasonable price of furniture as is mentioned in Section 123 of this Act, and
(c) Any such advance payment or rent as is mentioned in Section 126 of this Act.]
8
(5) ………………………………………………………………………………….
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Central London Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent at £1,034 per month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £232.61 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent should reflect the current market value and condition of the property.
- The fair rent determination must take into account the property's characteristics and local market conditions.
- The fair rent should be adjusted according to statutory formulas and the Rent Acts.
- The fair rent must consider the actual tenancy conditions.
- The fair rent should be calculated in accordance with the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A landlord's application for re-registration of a fair rent is subject to capping provisions if recent improvements do not add more than 15% value to the previous rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £470.88 per month for a property in Harrow.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, location, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the scarcity of similar properties in the local housing market.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the local housing market conditions when disputing a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included the property's condition, location, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
