Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Scarcity and Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, considering factors such as the property's condition and the availability of similar properties in the area. The rent was set at £10,032 per year, starting from January 24, 2025.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent for their property, taking into account the condition of the property and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the condition of the property and scarcity of similar properties in the area.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, taking into account the condition of the property and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The rent was set at £10,032 per annum, effective from 24 January 2025.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AP/F77/2024/0643
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 364 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
[APPELLANT] c/o [COMPANY]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is 10,032 Per Annum (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 24 January 2025
3. The amount for services is
Per
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £12,322 per annum.
[NAME] [NAME] of decision 24 January 2025
FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 392.1
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 284.6
X 392.1 Minus Y 284.6 = (A) 107.5
(A) 107.5 Divided by Y 284.6 = (B) 0.38
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.43
Last registered rent* 8,616.50 Multiplied by (C) = 12,321.59 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 12,322
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £12,322 Per Annum
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AP/F77/2024/0643 Property : 364 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicants (Tenant) : Miss [COUNSEL] : None Respondent (Landlord) : [COMPANY] : [COMPANY] of application : Section 70 of the Rent ACT 1977 Tribunal members :
Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Reasons : 24 January 2025
Reasons
2
The Tribunal determines £10,032 per annum is to be registered as the fair rent for the above property with effect from 24 January 2025 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.
Reasons
Background
On 24 September 2023 the landlord’s agent, applied to the Valuation Office Agency (Rent Officer) for registration of a fair rent of £771 per month.
The rent payable at the time of the application was £718 per month effective from 12 November 2018.
On 9 August 2024 the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £12,120 per annum which equates to £1,010 per month effective from the 9 August 2024. The rent increase imposed by the Rent Officer had not been “capped” or limited by the operation of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 (the Order).
By an email dated 11 September 2024 the tenant objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to this Tribunal.
The law
When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant, on the rental value of the property. Section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 imposes on the Tribunal an assumption that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling house in the locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms. This is commonly called ‘scarcity’.
[COMPANY] v [NAME] of the Greater Manchester Council (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] Tribunal [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and
3 (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 places a “cap” on the permissible amount of the increase of a fair rent between one registration and the next, by reference to the amount of the increase in the United Kingdom Index of Retail Prices between the dates of the two registrations. Where the cap applies the Rent Officer and the Tribunal is prevented from increasing the amount of the fair rent that it registers beyond the maximum fair rent calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Order and the mathematical formula set out in the Order. By article 2(7) of the 1999 Order the capping provisions do not apply “in respect of a dwelling-house if because of a change in the condition of the dwelling- house or the common parts as a result of repairs or improvements (including the replacement of any fixture or fitting) carried out by the landlord or a [NAME], the rent that is determined in response to an application for registration of a new rent under Part IV exceeds by at least 15% the previous rent registered or confirmed.” Hearing It had been agreed with the parties in advance that there would be a hearing held at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]. The Hearing A hearing took place at 10.40am on the 24 January 2025 which was attended by the Tenant and her good friend [APPELLANT]. The Tribunal has consideration of the comprehensive evidence provided by the Tenant which included a video, photographs, rent analysis schedule and completed reply form. The tenant provided the Tribunal evidence in connection with the significant improvements and maintenance undertaken by her together with very poor condition of the shared common parts and the front entrance door.
Facts found without Inspection.
The property is a self-contained first floor flat which forms part of a Victorian three storey building over commercial premises with brick and ornante stucco elevations and a pitched roof.
The property is located in a busy commercial road convenient to underground railway station.
The accommodation comprises: living rooms, kitchen, 2 bedrooms, shower room, roof terrace. There is gas central heating and timber single glazed window units. The property is approached via shared common parts and staircase which is very poor condition based upon the photographic evidence provided to the Tribunal.
4
Terms of the tenancy
The Tribunal issued Directions on the 29 October 2024 which set out a timescale for the proceedings. The Landlord’s Application for Registration of Fair Rent states the agreement commenced on the 24 September 1975. However, the Tenant provided the Tenant a copy of the actual agreement which commenced on the 19 April 1986. The agreement made the landlord responsible for structural repairs and external decorations. The tenant is responsible for internal decorations. It is assumed the property was let unfurnished.
Condition of the Property
The Tenant confirms that over the years she has carried out significant improvements and maintenance to provide a home. Such improvements include replacement kitchen and sanitary fittings, carpets and curtains, general decoration, white goods and the formation of a roof terrace with local authority planning consent. There is gas central heating installed by the Landlord. Windows are softwood single glazed units. The Tenant when asked, confirmed that when she moved in the property was in need of complete refurbishment and barely habitable with disrepair to all fittings. In essence, the Landlord has been absent and to her benefit the Tenant has assumed complete control of the flat over the years.
Written Evidence
The Tribunal had copies of the Valuation Office Agency correspondence including the previous rent registration together with the calculations for the most recent registration.
As previously mentioned, The Tenant provided a completed Reply Form with submissions and photographs in connection with the condition of the property.
Valuation
In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting.
Based upon its expert knowledge of the [ADDRESS] area, the Tribunal considers that the subject property, if finished to a reasonable standard would be likely to attract a rent let on an assured shorthold tenancy, of £22,800 per annum. (1,900 per month)
Next, the Tribunal needs to adjust that hypothetical rent of £22,800 per annum to allow for the differences between the terms of this tenancy, the Tenants improvements, single glazed windows, the lack of white goods, carpets and curtains, and the tenant’s decorating responsibilities (disregarding the
5 effect of tenant’s improvements and any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant).
The Tribunal has considered very carefully the information submitted by the Tenant.
Using its own expertise, the Tribunal considers that a deduction of 45% should be applied in order to take into account the matters stated above. This provides a deduction of £10,260 per annum from the hypothetical rent. This reduces the figure to £12,540 per annum.
It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
Scarcity
Thirdly, the Tribunal then went on to consider whether a deduction falls to be made to reflect scarcity within the meaning of section 70(2) of the 1977 Act. The tribunal followed the decision of the High Court in [COMPANY] v [NAME], in which it was held that scarcity over a wide area should be considered rather than scarcity in relation to a particular locality.
In the Tribunals opinion there should be a deduction of 20% for scarcity as it is considered demand outweighs supply of rented properties in the general area. This provides a figure of £2,505 and therefore reduces the rent to £10,032 per annum. This equates to £836 per month.
Conclusion
The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order apply and the calculation of the maximum fair rent is set out in the decision. The fair rent to be registered is not however limited by this figure because it is below the maximum fair rent of £12,322 per annum. Therefore, the fair rent to be registered is £10,032 per annum. In accordance with the statutory provisions, this takes effect from the 24 January 2025 being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.
Detailed calculations for the capped maximum fair rent are provided on the back of the decision form.
[NAME] 24 January 2025
6
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for a Property Under the Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent for property under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Property Condition and Scarcity
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at Maximum Level Under Rent Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £139 Per Week for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
- The fair rent takes into account the condition of the property.
- The fair rent considers the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
- The fair rent is capped according to statutory limits.
- The fair rent calculation includes adjustments based on the Retail Price Index.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £10,032 per annum for the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the condition of the property and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The scarcity of similar properties in the area was a key factor in setting the fair rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the availability of similar properties when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs, a video, and a rent analysis schedule were provided by the tenant.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving disputes over fair rent.
