VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair a person of £231.02 per week for a rented property, considering factors like the property's condition and market conditions. This decision is based on the a person Act 1977 and relevant regulations.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair a person that reflects the property's condition and market conditions, subject to statutory caps.

Topics

fair rent determinationmaximum fair rent calculationtenancy agreement

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair a person for a property after considering various factors and making necessary adjustments.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £231.02 per week for a property, adjusting for various factors and applying statutory caps as required by law.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AJ/F77/2025/0118

Notice of the Tribunal [NAME] 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Judge Tagliavini Mrs S Redmond MRICS

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The fair [NAME] is £231.02 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 3 June 2025

3. The amount for services is £15.10 Per week

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for [NAME] allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The [NAME] is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than [NAME]) where different from [NAME] entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair [NAME] to be registered is the maximum fair [NAME] as prescribed by the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999. The [NAME] that would otherwise have been registered was £ 249.60 per week.

(b) The fair [NAME] to be registered is not limited by the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair [NAME] per week of £242.50 including £15.10 per week for services prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Judge Tagliavini

Date of decision 3 June 2025

FR27 [NAME] FIGURE X 402.2

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 334.6

X 402.2 Minus Y 334.6 = (A) 77.6

(A) 77.6 Divided by Y 334.6 = (B) 0.231918

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.281918

Last registered [NAME]* 189.00 Multiplied by (C) = 242.28 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 242.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

[NAME] = £242.50 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair [NAME], in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair [NAME] to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered [NAME] by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair [NAME] determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the [NAME] is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the [NAME] 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair [NAME].

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AJ/F77/2025/0118

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 11 February 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, [NAME] 1977

Tribunal

: Judge Tagliavini

Mrs S Redmond MRICS

Date

: 3 June 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £231.02 per week (including £15.10 service charges) will be registered as the fair [NAME] with effect from 3 June 2025 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair [NAME] by the [NAME], the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the [NAME] 1977.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant.

Determination and Valuation

4. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market [NAME] for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £380 per week. From this level of [NAME] we have made adjustments of 25% in relation to:

Terms of tenancy (decorations) Lack of insulation White goods Curtains and carpets

Adjusted market [NAME]: £285 which net of service charges is £269.90 per week

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment of 20% for scarcity which provides a weekly [NAME] of £269.90. To this is added back service charges of £15.10 per week.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

[NAME]

£380 per week

Less

25% £95 per week

[NAME] £285

AMR net of service charge £269.90 Less

Scarcity

20% £53.98

3 [NAME] adjusted for scarcity

£215.92

Plus service charge

£15.10

[NAME]:

£231.02 per week

7. The Tribunal determines a [NAME] of £231.02 per week.

Decision

8. The uncapped fair [NAME] initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £231.02 per week. The capped [NAME] for the property according to the provisions of the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 is calculated at £237 per week.

9. The calculation of the capped [NAME] is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower [NAME] of £231.02 per week is to be registered as the fair [NAME] for this property.

Chairman: Judge Tagliavini

Date: 3 June 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent reflects current market conditions.
  • The fair rent calculation includes the Retail Price Index (RPI).
  • The fair rent takes into account the state of repair of the property.
  • The fair rent is determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The fair rent considers adjustments for tenant improvements.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • Recent improvements adding less than 15% value to the property.
  • The landlord's application for re-registration is subject to capping provisions.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £231.02 per week for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in this case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition, market conditions, and statutory caps to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need to adjust the rent based on the property's condition and market conditions.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the property's value.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the property's condition and market conditions, subject to statutory caps.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions and comparable evidence were important in determining the fair rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.