Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the fair rent for a property, applying the formula set by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The Tribunal took into account the property's condition, market rent, and scarcity factors.
⚖️ Legal holding
The fair rent for a property is determined by applying the formula prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, applying the Maximum Fair Rent formula.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, applying the Maximum Fair Rent formula prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The Tribunal considered the property's condition, market rent, and scarcity factors.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AU/F77/2025/0144
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Flat 9 Block C [NAME] London [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord [NAME]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £220.00 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 16 July 2025
3. The amount for services is £13.73 Per week
negligible/not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
- Per -
negligible/not applicable
5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ 408 ...................... per week .......................... including £ 13.73 ............. per week ........................ for services (variable).
(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ ................... per .................... including £ ......................................... per ................................. for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 16 July 2025
FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 402.9
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 274.7
X 402.9 Minus Y 274.7 = (A) 128.2
(A) 128.2 Divided by Y 274.7 = (B) 0.516690936
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.516690936
Last registered rent* 145 Multiplied by (C) = 219.92 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 220
Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £220.00 Per week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
1
Case Reference
: TR/LON/00AU/F77/2025/0144
Property : Flat C Block C, [NAME], [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [NAME] [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 3 March 2025
Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] of Reasons : 16 July 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The sum of £220.00 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 16 July 2025, being the date, the Tribunal made the Decision.
____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
FULL REASONS
Background
1. On 11 October 2024 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £180.25 per week for Flat 9 Block C [NAME], [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (the subject property).
2. The rent was previously registered on 26 June 2017 at £145.00 per week with effect from 6 August 2017. On 6 February 2025 the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £216.50 per week with effect from 6 February 2025. This rent appears to have been the rent determined under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 and was below the capped rent as provided for by The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
3. By an email dated 3 March 2025 the Tenant objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the First- tier Tribunal.
4. The Tribunal issued Directions on 16 May 2025 setting out the timetable and the steps the parties were required to take in preparation for the determination of this case.
The Law
5. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 (the Act), had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
6. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and
3
(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
7. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 (the 1999 Order) provides the framework that places a ceiling on the maximum rent that can be registered. The calculation is based upon a formula that applies an increase in the monthly United Kingdom Index of Retail Prices to the previously registered rent.
The Hearing & Evidence
8. A hearing was held on 16 July 2025 where the Tenant attended but there was no representative from the Landlord.
Tenant’s Submissions
9. During the hearing the Tenant advised that him and his wife had maintained the property to a good standard. When they require [NAME] to be involved, [APPELLANT] response times are slow.
10. The Tenant felt that the method of calculation contained within the legislation was not appropriate and that this should be changed. The Tribunal advised that this was not something that they could impact or change.
11. The Tenant submitted that they had provided a list of comparable fair rents from the government database and included this within their written submissions to the Tribunal.
12. The Tenant then went on to question or challenge the service charge that was in place for the property. The Tribunal advised that this was not a matter that this Tribunal could review. Should the Tenant wish to challenge their service charge then they should seek independent legal advice.
13. The Tenant provided additional submissions in relation to long response times when they had reported flooding issues to [NAME] historically and other maintenance issues. The Tenant also mentioned that the property is on the third floor with no lift.
4
Landlords’ Submissions
14. The Landlord provided no written submissions to the Tribunal.
Inspection
15. The Tribunal did not feel an inspection of the property was required and no request for an inspection was made by either party.
Determination and Valuation
16. The Tribunal initially needs to determine what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. In doing this, the Tribunal will consider the rental value of the property and will not consider the personal circumstances of the Tenant, as that is not a factor envisaged by the Act.
17. Neither party provided evidence of market rents in the area. Although the Tenant provided a list of properties in relation to the fair rent, these did not provide evidence of the market rent. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £600 per week.
18. From this level the Tribunal then adjusts the market rent to reflect the condition of the property as well as adjusting the figure to disregard any tenant improvements to the property. The full valuation with adjustments is shown after paragraph 20.
19. The next aspect to be considered is the issue of scarcity. The Tribunal was not provided with any specific evidence on this issue. However, the issue of scarcity is considered on the basis of the number of properties available to let and considering the demand for such properties and over a really large area. Neither party provided any specific evidence in respect of scarcity. Therefore, using our knowledge and experience we consider that in the wide geographical area of Greater London there is an imbalance between supply and demand and this impacts upon rental values.
Accordingly, we make a deduction for scarcity of approximately 20%.
20. The full valuation is shown below.
5
£/week Market Rent
600
Less Tenant’s decoration liability ) 5% No curtains or carpets
) 5% No provision of white goods ) 5%
90
510
Less Scarcity
approx. 20%
102
£408
21. The Tribunal determines a sum of £408 per week for the open market rent value of the property.
Decision
22. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £408.00 per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £220.00 per week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £220.00 per month is to be registered as the fair rent of this property.
23. The Tribunal should comment that the rent fixed by the Tribunal is the maximum rent and the Landlord may not charge a rent above that figure. However, in many cases when the Landlord is a Registered Social Landlord, the rent charge may be significantly less than the rent fixed by the Tribunal. As per the Landlord’s application, the Landlord was looking for a rent of £180.25 per week.
24. Accordingly, the sum of £220.00 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 16 July 2025 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 16 July 2025
6 APPEAL PROVISIONS
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Residential Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Statutory Caps
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent of £224.00 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent of £175 per week under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Capped Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was determined by applying the formula from the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- The Tribunal used its general knowledge of rental values in the area to estimate the open market rent.
- A deduction of approximately 20% was applied for scarcity due to an imbalance between supply and demand in Greater London.
- The Tribunal considered the property's condition, including the tenant's decoration liability, lack of curtains/carpets, and no white goods, to adjust the market rent.
- The final fair rent was rounded up to the nearest 50 pence after calculation.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's argument that the legislative calculation method for fair rent was inappropriate was rejected.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the fair rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court applied the formula prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to determine the fair rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the application of the Maximum Fair Rent formula.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that the landlord cannot exceed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect the fair rent to be determined based on the Maximum Fair Rent formula.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition, market rent, and scarcity factors were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure proper representation.
