VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a a person under the Rent Act 1977. They used a formula from the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to calculate the fair rent, taking into account the condition of the a person and comparing it with market rents.

⚖️ Legal holding

The fair rent is determined by considering the market rent adjusted for the condition of the property and then applying the formula under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £174.50 per week, applying the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, applying the formula in the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The Tribunal considered the condition of the property and compared it with market rents to determine the fair rent.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BD/F77/2023/0355

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 70 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [NAME]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £174.50 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 23 January 2024

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

0.00 Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

n/a

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £356.40 per week.

[NAME] of decision 23rd January 2024

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 377.3

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 304.0

X 377.3 Minus Y 304.0 = (A) 73.4

(A) 73.4 Divided by Y 304.0 = (B) 0.2414

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.2914

Last registered rent* £135.00 Multiplied by (C) = £174.35 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £174.50

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services No

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £174.50 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: LON/OOBD/F77/2023/0355 [NAME] : 70 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT] Landlord : Mr [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] (Hons) MA LLM

FRICS

HMCTS Code : Determination on papers (paper, video, audio) Date of Decision : 23rd January 2024 Date of Statement of Reasons: 23rd January 2024

_______________________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME])

2

Statement of Reasons

____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

Decision 1.The decision of the Tribunal is that the Fair Rent of £ 174.50 per week determined with effect 23rd January 2029. Background 2.The Rent Officer, received an application to re-register a fair rent, dated 22nd June 2023 made by the [NAME] requesting £1000.00 per month. 3.Prior to the application, the Rent Officer had registered a rent of £135.00 per week with effect from 24th June 202. Following the application by the landlord for re registration of a fair rent, the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £162.00 per week with effect from 27th September 2023. 4.In a note dated 27th September 2023 the landlord objected to the rent registered and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal ([NAME] Chamber) ([NAME]). 5.Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 15th November 2023 . Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the [NAME] and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations.

3

The [NAME] 6.The tribunal did not inspect the [NAME]. The [NAME] is a self-contained purpose built flat with central heating, comprising four rooms, one kitchen, a bathroom and WC. Relevant Law 7. Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms

4

(other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.

(3) There shall be disregarded- (a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”

Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the [NAME]. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the [NAME]. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:

(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the [NAME] discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to

5

there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject [NAME]).

In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent. Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Submissions Landlord 8. The landlord submitted a Reply Form noting that a £600.00 contribution had been made to the central heating provision.

9. By way of the objection received 24th November 2023, the landlord noted that rents of comparable properties on open market in contemporary condition achieved £ 550.00 to £554.00 per week. Tenant

6

10. The Tenant, in letter received by the Rent Officer on 7th July 2023 noted “ I had full central heating installed at my own cost for this address.” The Inspection Reasons for Decision 11. The rent to be determined must reflect the condition found on the date of the hearing disregarding all tenants' improvements.

12. The process for determining a fair rent is the application of Rent Act 1977 section 70 on the subject [NAME] and then comparison with the maximum rent permitted under the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999. This means that comparison with other properties the subject of Fair Rent is not material. Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject [NAME] in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. 13.Considering evidence submitted and the tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that the market rent, on modern assured shorthold tenancy terms would be £550.00 per week. However, the subject [NAME] is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 10% is made. 14.In addition, the tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. 15.Thereafter the tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted.

16. Market derived rental level - £550.00 per week Less 10% condition £ 55.00 per week --------------------------

7

£495.00 per week Less 10% for terms and supplied goods inc white goods £49.50 per week ------------------------------------------- £445.50 per week Less 20% for scarcity. £ 89.10 per week ------------------------------------------

18. The rent after this final adjustment was £356.40 per week.

Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 19. The rent to be registered is limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999 because the rent calculated in accordance with the Order is lower than section 70. 20.Accordingly, the sum of £174.50 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 23rd January 2024, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 23rd January 2024 Extended reasons: 23rd January 2024

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME] Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must:

8

a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted for the condition and characteristics of the property.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977, taking into account the Retail Price Index and relevant regulations.
  • A tenant is entitled to a maximum fair rent calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market conditions and the state of the property, adjusted for scarcity and capped by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • A landlord's application for a new fair rent must comply with the maximum fair rent calculation under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the condition of the property and compared it with market rents.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparison with market rents.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the condition of their property and market rents.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the condition of the property and market rents mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.