Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00ML/F77/2020/0029

Notice of the Tribunal [NAME] 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Flat 98, [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair [NAME] is £13,201.72 Per Annum (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 21 January 2021

3. The amount for services is £1,592.22 Per Annum

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for [NAME] allowance is

£419.17 Per Annum

5. The [NAME] is to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than [NAME]) where different from [NAME] entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair [NAME] to be registered is the maximum fair [NAME] as prescribed by the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999. The [NAME] that would otherwise have been registered was £13,518.72 per Annum including £1,592.22 per Annum for services (variable).

[NAME] of decision 21 January 2021

FR24 [NAME] FIGURE X 293.5

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 281.7

X 293.5 Minus Y 281.7 = (A) 11.8

(A) 11.8 Divided by Y 281.7 = (B) 0.04189

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.09189

Last registered [NAME]* £10,732.87 Multiplied by (C) = 11609.04 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £11,609.50

Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services £1,592.22

[NAME] = £13,201.72 Per Annum

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair [NAME], in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair [NAME] to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered [NAME] by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair [NAME] determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the [NAME] is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the [NAME] 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair [NAME].

1

Case Reference : CHI/00ML/F77/2020/0029

Property : Flat 98 [NAME], [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : [NAME]

Tenant : Mr M [COUNSEL]

: None

Type of Application : [NAME] 1977 – Section 70

Appeal of [NAME]

Tribunal Members : [NAME] (Chairman)

C [NAME]

N Robinson FRICS

Date of Inspection : 21st January 2021

Date of Decision : 21st January 2021 ____________________________________________ DECISION ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

BACKGROUND

1) On 5th August 2020 the Landlord made an application to register the [NAME] of the property at £12,879.40 plus Variable Service Charge.

2) The [NAME] payable at the time of the application was £10,732.874 per annum plus the Variable Service Charge.

3) The [NAME] was previously registered on the 9th October 2018 at £12,600 per annum with effect from the 31st October 2018. The Register notes a fuel charge of £390.38 per annum which was not counting for the [NAME] allowance. It also noted an amount of £1,867.13 was attributable to services.

4) On the 12th October 2020 the [NAME] registered a [NAME] of £12,840 per annum, and noted the fuel charge as £419.17 per annum and the services of £1,592.22 per annum, exclusive of rates with effect from that date.

5) On the 3rd November 2020 the Landlord objected, and the matter was referred to the First-Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).

6) On the of 11th December 2020 the Tribunal made Directions informing the parties that in view of the Government’s advice with respect to the Covid 19 outbreak an inspection would not take place. The parties were given the opportunity to provide supporting photographs of the property and if desired make representations to have the case stayed until an inspection was possible.

7) The Directions required the Landlord to send a statement to the Tenant and to the Tribunal supporting the application for an increase in [NAME]. The Tenant was also required to send a statement to the Landlord and to the Tribunal in support of his objection.

8) Neither party requested a Hearing.

9) The Tribunal met on 21st January 2021 to consider the application.

10) The matter was dealt with as a paper determination without hearing. In the current circumstances it has not been possible to inspect the property and the Tribunal relied on submissions from the Landlord and Tenant in correspondence, publicly available housing data online and its own expert knowledge. One member of the Tribunal has sat in earlier determinations of [NAME] at the block.

EVIDENCE

11) The Tribunal received written representations from the Landlord and these were copied to the parties. No representations were received from the Tenant. The [NAME] Office supplied some records and copies of correspondence they had had with the parties.

3

12) [NAME] is a large block of about 145 units built in the mid 1960’s in a residential district of Hove fronting onto three different roads. All local facilities are within easy reach.

13) The self-contained flat is situated on the fifth floor and has 2 bedrooms, bathroom/WC, living room, kitchen. There is communal central heating and hot water, and double glazing. In the grounds are communal car parking spaces, and there is a right to park in one of the unallocated spaces if vacant.

14) No tenancy agreement was provided. The [NAME] notes the start date as 24th June 1985, and the parties’ responsibilities are as per S11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

15) Prior to the consideration the Tribunal obtained details from the [NAME] of the floor area they had within their records for the flat. Their records state it is 75 square metres.

Landlord’s Submissions

16) The Tribunal copies below the Landlord’s submissions:

1. [NAME] – A property description purpose built flat comprising 3 rooms, kitchen and bathroom/WC. The flat benefits from the provision of heating and hot water, residents parking and onsite resident manager. As you will see from the evidence, comparable properties of the same size in the same block are achieving between £18,276.00 and £19,860.00 per annum.

Property Address Tenure [NAME]

17 [NAME] 3 Room1Kitchen Bathroom £19,860.00 58 [NAME] 3 Room1Kitchen Bathroom £19,596.00 28 [NAME] 3 Room1Kitchen Bathroom £18,444.00 70 [NAME] 3 Room1Kitchen Bathroom £18,276.00

In view of the above we consider the market [NAME] for the subject property to be £19,044.00 per annum, if let on an Assured Shorthold Tenancy with carpets and white goods.

2. Scarcity – We consider that presently there should be no deduction for scarcity as the current demand for rented property in the area does not outstrip supply. At present there are over comparable properties available to [NAME] within a ½ mile radius of the property, so scarcity of supply is not inflating rental prices in the area.

3. Condition – We are not aware of any failure by the landlord to fulfil their statutory and contractual obligations as defined in the tenancy agreement. In the event that the tenant has failed to report any disrepair to the managing agents, we do not feel it appropriate or in

4

accordance with [NAME] 1977, Section 70, to make deductions under such circumstances.

4. Location – The property is a short walk from local shops, amenities and Hove train station with fast connections to London Victoria and southern towns.

5. Conclusion – We conclude, therefore, that an appropriate [NAME] is properly assessed at a minimum of £14,544.00 per annum allowing for the age, condition and locality of the property and that it is unfurnished, calculated as follows:

[NAME]:

£19,044.00 Carpets/White Goods £1500.00 Updated Kitchen/bathroom £3000.00 Heating

£0 Scarcity @ 5%:

£0 [NAME]:

£14,544.00 [NAME] at the last registration = 284.2 , this registration = 294.3. Percentage increase = 10.1% Increase plus 5% enhancement = 15.1 %increase. £10,732.87 +Variable service charge + 15.1% enhancement = £12,353.53 MFR rounded to £12,354.00 rounded up to nearest 50 pence annum.

In view of the above, as the [NAME] calculation is the lower of the above two results, we submit that the [NAME] of £12,353.53 per annum should be set as the new fair [NAME] and the [NAME] should be registered at this level.

Tenant’s Submissions

17) The Tenant made no submissions.

THE LAW

18) When determining a [NAME] the Tribunal, in accordance with the [NAME] 1977, section 70, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It must also disregard the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the Tenants or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. That section also required the Tribunal not to take into account the personal financial and other circumstances of the Tenants.

19) In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME]

5

Committee (1999) QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised that section 70 means that: a) Ordinarily a [NAME] is the market [NAME] for the subject property discounted for ‘scarcity’ and b) For the purposes of determining the market [NAME], assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between these comparables and the subject property).

20) The [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 limits the increase from the previous registered [NAME]. It is worked out by a formula based on the change in Retail Prices Index since the last registration plus a fixed percentage increase set by law. If the [NAME] or the Tribunal decides the property is worth more than the maximum fair [NAME], the maximum fair [NAME] becomes the registered [NAME]. If the valuation is lower than the maximum fair [NAME] that valuation becomes the registered [NAME].

21) There are two occasions when the maximum fair [NAME] will not apply: - If there is no existing registered [NAME], and If the Landlord has improved or repaired the property and the [NAME] and/or the Tribunal considers the improvement or repair has made the [NAME] at least 15% more than the existing registered [NAME].

VALUATION

The [NAME]

22) The Tribunal firstly determined what [NAME] the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting exclusive of water rates and council tax.

23) In the competitive letting market that now exists, properties need to be in first class structural and decorative order and be equipped with all amenities such as full modern central heating, double glazing and other energy-saving facilities along with white goods, carpets and curtains to ensure the property attains its full rental income potential. Where such items and facilities are missing the [NAME] is found to be correspondingly lower.

24) The Tribunal was assisted by the comparables submitted by the Landlord to a certain extent, but information was sparse, and so the Tribunal also relied on its knowledge and experience of general [NAME] levels for this type of property in this area.

25) The Tribunal noted from the EPC register dated 10th February 2017 the rating is 76C and the floor area is 56 square metres. This floor area varies considerably to that given by [NAME].

26) The [NAME]’s computations show that it was considered an open market rental value of £14,400 per annum was appropriate.

6

27) The Tribunal concluded that an appropriate open market [NAME] for the property let on a modern open market letting of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy where the Landlord supplies white goods, carpets and curtains and the Tenant has no liability to carry out repairs or decorations, would be £16,500 per annum, including £1,592.22 Variable Service Charge.

28) However, the Tribunal noted from the representations made, together with the notes from the [NAME], that the actual property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market [NAME], and it was necessary to adjust that hypothetical [NAME] of £16,500 per annum to allow for the differences between the condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property.

29) Firstly it removes the Variable Service Charge from the hypothetical [NAME] to enable adjustments to be made to the net rental element. This equates to £14,907.78 per annum.

30) The Tribunal lists below several items that impact upon the rental value and requires an appropriate adjustment to be made

(a) Tenant’s Repairing and Decorating Liabilities (b) White Goods (c) Carpets and Curtains (d) Old kitchen and bathroom

31) There is no laid down formula for assessing each individual item’s impact on the rental value. The Tribunal has used its own knowledge and experience in assessing the overall impact these times would have when taken into account by a hypothetical tenant who would then require an appropriate reduction in [NAME] to take these into account.

32) The Tribunal considered these factors and decided that a deduction of 20% should be made, which gives a [NAME] of £11,926.22 per annum, rounded up to the next 50p (in line with the MFR calculations method) giving £11,926.50. The Variable Service Charge is then added back on which gives a [NAME] of £13,518.72 per annum.

Scarcity 33) The Tribunal did not consider that there was any substantial scarcity element for this type of property in this area and accordingly no further deduction was made for scarcity.

Other matters 34) The Landlord’s submissions on the [NAME] are noted, but the correct calculations are shown on the Tribunal’s [NAME].

THE DECISION

7

35) We therefore determined that the uncapped [NAME] is £13,518.72 per annum including £1,592.22 in respect of services.

36) As this amount is above the [NAME] calculated in accordance with the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision notice we determine that the lower sum of £13,201.72 per annum is registered as the [NAME] with effect from 21st January 2021.

37) The registered [NAME] is to be entered/confirmed as variable in accordance with the terms of the tenancy ([NAME] 1977, s.71(4)).

Appeals

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), which may be on a point of law only, must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not, to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.