VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a protected tenancy, considering the property's condition and state of repair. The fair rent was set at £12054.19 per year, including service charges.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal, taking into account the property's condition, location, and state of repair.

Topics

fair rent determinationprotected tenancyrent regulation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1)section 70

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the property's condition, location, and state of repair.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a protected tenancy, considering the property's condition and state of repair under the Rent Act 1977. The fair rent was set at £12054.19 per year, including service charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AP/F77/2024/0035

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], , [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [COMPANY]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £12054.19 Per year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 24 May 2024

3. The amount for services is £864.96 Per Year

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

£130.46 Per Year

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 13753.00 per year including £ 864.92 per year for services (variable) , of which £130.46 was attributed to fuel, prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 24 May 2024

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 383.00

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 291.00

X 383.00 Minus Y 291.00 = (A) 92

(A) 92 Divided by Y 291.00 = (B) 0.3161

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.366

Last registered rent* £9428.63 Multiplied by (C) = £12879.51 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £12880.00

Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services £14440.00

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £13753.00 Per year

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference

: LON/OOAP/F77/2023/0035 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] (Hons) MA LLM

FRICS Mrs [NAME] : Hearing no inspection Date of Decision : 24 May 2024 Date of Statement of Reasons: 24 May 2024 _______________________________________________

Statement of Reasons

____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Decision 1.The decision of the Tribunal is that a fair rent of £12054.19 per year including £864.96 for services of which £ 130.46 is attributed for fuel. is determined with an effective date of 24 May 2024. Background 2. An application was made to re-register a fair rent, dated 16 August 2023, by the landlord of the property [RESPONDENT] requesting a Fair Rent of £369 per week, with £390 per quarter noted for services. Prior to the application to re-register a fair rent, the Rent Officer had registered a rent of £9965.50 per year with effect from 8 November 2019 including £536.87 per year for services of which £ 172.77 per year are attributed to fuel charges following determination by the First –tier-Tribunal.

3. Subsequently the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £12,780.00 per year with £864.96 per year included and noted for services of which £130.46 per year for fuel charges with effect from 14 November 2023.

4. In a letter Mr [APPELLANT] the Tenant, received 4 December 2023, objected to the rent registered and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property).

5. Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 13 February 2024. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the Property and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. The Property 6. The Tribunal did not inspect the property.

The property is a self contained purpose built flat , with partial central heating comprising ; 3 rooms, 1 kitchen, and 1 bathroom/WC. Double glazed windows Bathroom pre dates 1984 , 1930s bath/ wash hand basin / Kitchen units 2006 semi fitted . Pay electricity separately , but not the gas. Property wired by T Relevant Law 7. Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as amend ed by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.]

(2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.

(3) There shall be disregarded- (a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”

Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the Property. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:

(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject property).

In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent. Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Submissions Landlord 8. No submissions from the landlord were received, other than the Application to Register a Fair Rent and a Completed Reply Form. The completed Reply Form, outlined the accommodation, and noted the works carried out by the Landlord since 2021 , including work to the boiler and associated pipework.

The Landlord also submitted the breakdown from the service charge for the year ending in March 2023 which showed £130.46 per year. Tenant 9. By letter dated 11 March 2023 the Tenant requested a hearing. The Hearing The Tenant attended the hearing, the Landlord did not. The Tenant described the property and noted that due to the proximity of the flat to the lift there was noise disturbance. The tenant did not have a specific figure in mind for the Fair Rent but asked to the Tribunal to take into account the properties condition and general levels of rent. The Determination 10. The property was not inspected. Reasons for Decision 11. The rent to be determined must reflect the condition found on the date of the hearing disregarding all tenants' improvements.

12. The process for determining a fair rent is the application of Rent Act 1977 section 70 on the subject property and then comparison with the maximum rent permitted under the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999. This means that comparison with other properties the subject of Fair Rent is not material.

13. Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert Tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that the rent was £1700 per month if let on a contemporary assured shorthold basis.

14. The Property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent, therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 20% is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured

shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted.

15. Evidence from the Rent register shows that the Tenant is responsible for payment of a service charge within the rent. This is stated as £864.92 per year. Rents derived from assured shorthold tenancies would not be expected to pay a service charge. So the total rental bid for this property would not be more than the rental figure without a service charge. In this case that is £1700.00 per month, which equates to £20,400 per year. However, the service charge also includes some matters which the Tenant would expect to pay separately for, in this case that is gas which is £130.46 per year. The calculation 16. The rent prior to adjustment for condition, terms, service charge and scarcity is £20,400 per year. Contemporary rents are derived from assured shorthold tenancies. These comparable tenancy's do not generally require the Tenant to pay towards the service charge. Therefore, the total bid a Tenant would make is net of service charge. The Tribunal therefore makes an adjustment from the contemporary market rent to deduct the service charge of £846.96 per year of which £130.46 per year is made up of fuel costs. The net being £846.96 per year less £130.46 per year giving £716.50 per year. £20,400 per year Less £716.50 per year --------------------- £19683.50 per year

Less 20% condition (dated bathroom, and tenant undertaking the wiring) Less £3936.70 per year --------------------------

£15746.80 per year Less 10% for terms interior decoration liability and supplied goods inc white goods £1574.68 per year ------------------------------------------- £14172.12 per year Less 20% for scarcity. £2834.42 per year ------------------------------------------ £11337.69 per year Add back service charge, net of gas (£130.46) £716.50 per year --------------------------------- £12054.19 per year Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 17. The rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £13753.00 per year. This figure is higher than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments, of £12054.19 per year, including service charge of £864.96 per year of which £130.46 per year is fuel.

18.

Accordingly, the sum of £12054.19 per year including service charge of £864.96 per year of which £130.46 per year is fuel, will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 24 May 2024, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 24 May 2024 Extended reasons: 24 May 2024

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal

A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £12054.19 per year, including services and fuel charges.
  • The fair rent calculation included a deduction of 20% for the property's condition, noting the dated bathroom and tenant's wiring responsibility.
  • A further 10% deduction was applied to the rent to account for differences in tenancy terms and supplied goods compared to a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy.
  • A 20% deduction was made for scarcity, reflecting the assumption that the number of people seeking similar properties is not substantially greater than available properties.
  • The maximum fair rent calculation under the 1999 Order was £13753.00 per year, which was higher than the determined fair rent, so the determined rent was not limited.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's requested fair rent of £369 per week was not accepted as the final determination.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £12054.19 per year for a protected tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord in a protected tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition, location, and state of repair, as well as the relevant legal framework.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and related regulations were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the property's condition and the need for a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and state of repair.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and state of repair of their property when disputing a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and state of repair was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving disputes over fair rent.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.