Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenant's Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the fair rent for a protected tenant's property, taking into account the property's condition, market conditions, and the availability of similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market conditions and the state of the property, adjusted for scarcity.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a protected tenant's property, considering various factors including the property's condition and market conditions.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the fair rent for a protected tenant's property, considering the property's condition, market conditions, and scarcity of similar properties in the area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/41UG/F77/2018/0051
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 15A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]
Landlord J [APPELLANT]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £382.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 06 February 2019
3. The amount for services is not applicable N/A Per N/A
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is not applicable N/A Per N/A
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
None
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £391.00 per month prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 6 February 2019
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 285.6
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 212.1
X 285.6 Minus Y 212.1 = (A) 73.5
(A) 73.5 Divided by Y 212.1 = (B) 0.346
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.396
Last registered rent* £280.00 Multiplied by (C) = £390.88 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £391.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £391.00 Per month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
1
Case Reference : BIR/41UG/F77/2018/0051
Property
: 15A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : Appeal against the Rent Officer’s Decision of Fair
Rent under s.70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME].D. [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) [NAME] [NAME]. [NAME] and Venue of : None. Paper Determination. Hearing
Date of Decision : 6 February 2019
____________________________________________________________
DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
1 The Fair Rent is determined at £382.00 (Three Hundred and Eighty Two Pounds) per calendar month from 6 February 2019.
REASONS
Introduction
2 [NAME] [APPELLANT] holds a protected tenancy of 15A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]. The rent had previously been registered by the Rent Officer at £280.00 per month on 6 March 2008 to take effect from the same date. On 8 October 2018 the landlord applied for an increase to £450.00 per month and on 2 November 2018 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £389.50 per month to take effect on that date.
3 The tenant appealed against the Decision by letter to the Valuation Office Agency on 12 November 2018 and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal for Determination. The Tribunal inspected the property and reached its decision on 6 February 2019 and the Decision papers were sent to the parties with a copy of the Maximum Fair Rent calculation. On 4 March 2019 the Tribunal received a letter from the tenant requesting reasons for the Decision which are the subject of this document.
The Law
4 [NAME] [APPELLANT] is a protected tenant as acknowledged by the landlord. We have not been provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement but understand the property had been let unfurnished with the landlord responsible for repairs to the structure and exterior with the tenant responsible for internal decoration in accordance with s.11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.
5 Accordingly, the rent falls to be determined in accordance with s.70 of the Rent Act 1977.
6 S.70(1) states that in determining a fair rent, regard has to be had to all the circumstances of the tenancy (other than personal circumstances) including the age, character, locality and state of repair of the house, whether the property is let furnished and whether a premium had been paid or would be required to renew, continue or assign the tenancy.
7 s.70(2) adds a further qualification that it is assumed that the number of parties seeking to become tenants of similar houses in the locality on the terms of the tenancy (other than the rent) is not substantially greater than the number of houses available to let on such terms. This is usually referred to as 'scarcity' and the Court of Appeal held in [COMPANY]. v Chairman of the Greater Manchester Rent Assessment Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 that under normal circumstances the fair rent would be the market rent discounted for scarcity. [ADDRESS] also held that assured tenancy rents could be considered comparable to market rents.
8 s.70(3) requires the valuation to disregard any disrepair due to a tenant's failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy and any improvements carried out by either the tenants or their predecessor in title.
3
Facts Found
9 The Tribunal inspected the property on 6 February 2019. It is located in a well established
residential estate in Stafford within walking distance of the town centre and local facilities.
It comprises a three bedroom flat on the first floor of a parade of local shops.
It is in basic condition.
10 The accommodation comprises an entrance hall on the ground floor with stairs up to the Flat that comprises a living room, kitchen, three bedrooms, bathroom and separate w.c. There is partial double glazing but no central heating.
11 [NAME] [APPELLANT] had fitted metal security gates to the ground floor entrance to prevent
access by local youths which constituted a tenant's improvement to be disregraded from the rent when assessing the Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.
Submissions
12 Neither party requested a Hearing.
13 [NAME] [APPELLANT]'s letter of 6 November objected to the Rent Officer's rent on the basis that the lack of central heating made it cold in winter and he considered an increase of almost 40% to be excessive.
In an earlier letter of 18 October 2019, [NAME] [APPELLANT] said he was concerned by youths loitering around the shop doorways which was why he had fitted the security gates.
14 The landlord's submission comprised an email from [NAME] [RESPONDENT].[NAME] on behalf of the company where he said that his firm acted as managing agents for the premises at 13A-[ADDRESS], and the rents of these premises (with the exception of two Regulated Tenancies), were in the range of £425-£495 per month.
Decision
15 To assess the Fair Rent the Tribunal need to assess the rental value of the flat in good condition as a starting point, assuming it had been well maintained and modernised with central heating, reasonable kitchen units and a bathroom suite in fair condition, fully equipped with carpets and curtains and ready to let in the open market.
16 Based on the evidence supplied by [NAME] [NAME] and the Tribunal's own general knowledge and experience, the Tribunal assessed the market rent of the property, in good condition, at £475.00 per month.
17 However, it had not been let in that condition. The Tribunal deducted £10.00 per month for the lack of carpets or curtains, £30 per month for the lack of central heating and £10 for the lack of white goods provided by the landlord. This left a net rent of £425.00 per month.
18 The Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in s.70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 and found that the number of potential tenants looking for accommodation of this type in the area would have been greater than the number of units available to let. The Tribunal found
4
there was excess demand and deducted £43.00 per month from the market rent to arrive at the statutory basis.
19 Deducting £43.00 for scarcity left a net rent of £382.00 per month.
20 The rent was not limited by The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 as the rent determined was less than the maximum of £391.00 under the Order.
21 There were no services to take into account.
22 Accordingly, the Tribunal determined the Fair Rent at £382.00 (Three Hundred and Eighty Two Pounds) per calendar month with effect from 6 February 2019.
[NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS Chairman
Appeal
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision an application may be made to this Tribunal for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, Property Chamber (Residential Property) on a point of law only. Any such application must be received within 28 days after these reasons have been sent to the parties under Rule 52 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Capped Fair Rent for Social Housing Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects current market conditions.
- The fair rent takes into account the property's state of repair and condition.
- The rent is adjusted for scarcity of similar properties.
- The fair rent is determined using the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- The tribunal considers the tenant's improvements and the property's age and location.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the fair rent for a protected tenant's property at £382.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant with a protected tenancy and the landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the property's condition, market conditions, and scarcity of similar properties to determine the fair rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the assessment of the property's condition and the market conditions.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who appealed against the initial rent determination.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the market conditions when appealing a rent determination.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included the inspection of the property and submissions from both the tenant and the landlord.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an application may be made to the Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
