Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent for a property, considering its condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the market. The rent was set at £725.40 per month, effective from 17 August 2023.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market scarcity.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, adjusting for its condition and scarcity in the market.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent for a property, taking into account its condition and market scarcity. The rent was set at £725.40 per month, effective from 17 August 2023.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AC/F77/2023/0152
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 26 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord [COMPANY] [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £725.40 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 17 August 2023
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
negligible/not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
negligible/not applicable
5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
n/a
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £932.00 per month prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 17th August 2023
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 375.3
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 301.9
X 375.3 Minus Y 301.9 = (A) 73.40
(A) 73.40 Divided by Y 301.9 = (B) 0.2431
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.2931
Last registered rent* £720.50 Multiplied by (C) = £931.69 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £932.00
Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services No
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £932.00 Per Month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference
: JM/LON/OOAC/F77/2023/0152
Property : 26 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT], [NAME] of Application : Determination of a Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] MA LLM FRICS Mr [NAME] : [ADDRESS] (paper, video, audio)
Date of Decision : 17th August 2023
_______________________________________________
Statement of Reasons
____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 17th August 2023 of the determined Fair Rent of £725.40 per month with effect from same date. By way of application, dated 6th March 2023 received by the Rent Officer, made by the landlord of the property, the landlord applied for re registration of a fair rent of £ 900.63 per month. Previously the Rent Officer had registered a rent of £720.50 per month with effect from 11th May 2021. The Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £880.00 per month with effect from 11th May 2023. In a letter received by the Rent Officer 27th April 2023 the tenant, [APPELLANT] objected to the new registered fair rent, and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property). Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 8th June 20232 Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the Property and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. The Property Neither party requested the tribunal to inspect the property, nor did the tribunal consider it proportionate to do so. The property is a self-contained conversion flat without central heating , comprising three rooms one kitchen, a bathroom and one WC. Relevant Law Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent;
(b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.
(3) There shall be disregarded- (a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”
Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the Property.
In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining t2he market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject property).
In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent. Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Pre hearing Submissions Landlord No submissions from landlord other than initial application to register a fair rent and the objection notice. Tenant In a letter dated 4th July 2023, the tenant included; a completed Reply Form, The Reply Form noted – there is no central heating, no double glazing, there are carpets and curtains supplied by the tenant and there are no white goods.
The form under improvements notes...
“ all repairs and internal/external decorations have been carried out by ourselves. I have selected “No inspection” however I would be happy to have an inspection visit which would show how we (now myself) have maintained and cared for the property over the past 50 years.”
Under Disrepairs / Defects “ Since acquiring this property in the 1980s the landlord has not carried out a single site visit (except if the recent visit to inspect the windows and then only on the strong encouragement of Barnet Council who said they would need to step in should the landlord not commit to their repair) However , despite their reassurance on this 4th May visit, I have still not had a follow up nor a date for the replacement of the windows which have long been in a very dilapidated state. The representative also promised a smoke alarm and a carbon monoxide alarm”
Other comments ..
“ I fully understand this is a valuation tribunal. However I would like to state that since losing my wife I am supporting the rent payments on small cash reserves and one pension- I feel that £160 pcm increase is excessive. Whilst I accept the 2 yearly reviews are in place by law , I hope the tribunal will consider a fairer increase.” Additionally, four examples of properties to let with prices ranging from £1500.00 per month, £1525 pcm , £1600.00 pcm, and £1650 pcm for 2 bedroom flats.
The Hearing The tenant took the tribunal through the condition of the property and the improvements made to the property during his tenancy. The tenant Mr [APPELLANT] noted that he had decorated the front outside of the property three times , during his tenancy. Starting with the kitchen, he noted that on arrival the kitchen only had a basin with hot and cold water. The landlord having supplied an immersion heater. The kitchen units were subsequently fitted by the tenant. Heating to the property is by electric radiators supplied and fitted at the tenant's cost. The bathroom contains the original bath and basin but has subsequently had cupboards fitted by the tenant. The wiring for the flat has been replaced and upgraded by the tenant. The property enjoys use of the front garden and part of the rear garden.
There is no insulation in the loft, also noted was the rear of the property has not been decorated for many years and the windows are in a poor state. Overall, the windows are wooden single glazed original.
Reasons for Decision The rent to be determined must reflect the condition found on the date of the hearing disregarding all tenants' improvements. The process for determining a fair rent is the application of the Rent Act 1977 section 70 on the subject property and then comparison with the maximum rent permitted under the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999. This means that comparison with other properties the subject of Fair Rent is not material. Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that such a likely market rent, if a market rent is adopted would be £ 1550.00 per month However, the Property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 35% is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted. Market derived rental level - £1550.00 per month Less 35% condition - £542.50 per month --------------------------- £1007.50 per month
Less 10% for terms and supplied goods inc white goods - £1oo.75 per month ------------------------------------- £906.75 per month
Less 20% for scarcity - £181.35 per month
The rent after this final adjustment was £725.40 per month. Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 The rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £932.00 per month. This figure is higher than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments, of £725.40 per month.
Accordingly, the sum of £725.40 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 17th August 2023, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 17th August 2023
Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Considering Property Condition and Scarcity
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Statutory Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination Under the Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Based on Condition and Market
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £510 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was determined to be £725.40 per month, reflecting the property's condition and market factors.
- The property's poor condition, including lack of central heating and dilapidated windows, led to a 35% deduction from the market rent.
- The difference in tenancy terms and supplied goods, like white goods, from a modern assured shorthold tenancy justified a 10% deduction.
- A 20% deduction was applied to the rent to account for the scarcity of similar properties available for letting.
- The maximum fair rent calculation under the 1999 Order was £932.00, which was higher than the determined fair rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's initial application for a fair rent of £900.63 per month was not accepted by the tribunal.
- The Rent Officer's registered fair rent of £880.00 per month was not upheld by the tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a fair rent of £725.40 per month for a property.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the market.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the scarcity of similar properties in the market.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the scarcity of similar properties in the market when seeking a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence regarding the property's condition and market comparables mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
