VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy at £204 Per Week

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £204 per week for a property in a person, London. They considered the property's condition and local market conditions to determine the fair rent.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and local market conditions.

Topics

fair rent determinationtenancy conditions

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 s.70Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent considering the property's condition and local market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £204 per week for a property located in Muswell Hill, London, taking into account the property's condition and local market conditions.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AP/F77/2023/0350

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge Professor H [NAME] MA [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 204.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 24th January 2024

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

0.00 Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

N/A

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £257 per week prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Judge Professor H Carr Date of decision 24th Jan 24

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 379.0

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 307.4

X 379.0 Minus Y 307.4 = (A) 71.6

(A) 71.6 Divided by Y 307.4 = (B) 0.232921

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.282921

Last registered rent* 200 Multiplied by (C) = 256.58 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 257

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £257 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case reference

: LON/00BK/F77/2023/0047

Property : Flat A [ADDRESS]

: [APPELLANT]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT] of Application : Rent Act 1977

The Tribunal

: Judge H [NAME] of determination : 24th January 2024

Date of full reasons : 29th January 2024

FULL REASONS

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2015

MAN/00FA/F77/2015/0126 1

Decision 1. The fair rent determined by the Tribunal is £204 per week. 2. The effective date is 24th January 2024.

Background 3. The property is a self-contained converted flat without central heating comprising 3 rooms, a bathroom/WC and a kitchen.

4. The rent was previously registered on 20th August 2021 (effective from 9th September 2021) at £200 per week.

The landlord applied to the Rent Officer for a fresh registration of the rent on 15th August 2023 and a rent of £250per week, was registered on 25th September 2023 effective from that date. The landlord had in its application suggested a rent of £250 per week.

5. The tenant appealed against the rent registration on 11th October 2023 . The basis for the appeal was that the 25% increase in rent was unjustified.

6. The tenant requested a hearing. He attended the hearing along with his wife. The landlord did not appear.

The Hearing

7. The landlord provided no evidence.

8. Mr [RESPONDENT] gave evidence as follows: a. The property was virtually a shell at the commencement of the tenancy. b. There is no central heating. c. The tenant installed a kitchen to the property which entailed levelling the floor in addition to fitting all untis. d. The bathroom is more than 15 years old. e. There are insufficient electric sockers for contemporary usage in the property, with no more than two sockets per room. f. The tenant has provided carpets, curtains and white goods. g. The gardens at front and back of the property are maintained by the tenant to a high standard.

MAN/00FA/F77/2015/0126 2

Inspection

9. The Tribunal did not inspect the property. The tenant did not request an inspection and the Tribunal did not consider it was necessary as the tenant had fully outlined the condition of the property.

The law

10. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70: (1) has regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property; (2) disregards the effect on the rental value of the property of (a) any relevant tenant improvements and (b) any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy; (3) assumes (as required by s.70(2)) that, whatever might be the case, the demand for similar rented properties in the locality does not significantly exceed the supply of such properties for rent. In other words that the effect of any such ‘scarcity’ on rental values is not reflected in the fair rent of the subject property.

11. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised that section 70 means (a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the subject property discounted for ‘scarcity’ and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property). Thus once the market rent for the property has been determined by the exercise in (2) above that rent must be adjusted, where necessary, for any scarcity.

12. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 (SI 1999/6) is applicable.

Determination

13. The Tribunal determined, having regard to comparable properties available for letting at market rents in the area, that the open market rent for the property in good condition was £425 per week.

MAN/00FA/F77/2015/0126 3

14. It considered that deductions of 40% (£ 170) should be made for the lack of double glazing, central heating, unmodernised bathroom lack of white goods and carpeting. This 40% deduction also takes into account work undertaken at the tenant’s expense in relation to the kitchen.

15. The Tribunal also determined that there was scarcity in the area and made a further deduction of 20% (£ 51).

16. This gave an overall deduction £221 from the open market rent to arrive at a rounded fair rent of £204 per week

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent is calculated based on the Retail Price Index.
  • The fair rent reflects the property's condition.
  • The fair rent considers local market conditions.
  • The fair rent takes into account the landlord's improvements to the property.
  • The fair rent is assessed according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £204 per week for a property in a person, London.

Who was involved?

The tenant appealed against a higher rent proposed by the landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided on a fair rent after considering the property's condition and local market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant argued that the proposed rent increase was unjustified given the property's condition.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can appeal a higher rent if they believe it is unjustified based on the property's condition and local market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and local market conditions was presented.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.