First-tier Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at £613
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided to cap the fair rent at £613 per month for a property, following the formula under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a capped fair rent under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal capped the fair rent at £613 per month after calculating the maximum fair rent under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property to be £613 per month, applying the formula under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AX/F77/2024/0063
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 34 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mrs [APPELLANT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £613 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 16 April 2024
3. The amount for services is
Per
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent iis not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
The gross rent £910.58 (25% ownership)
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £692.35 per week.
Chairman E [NAME] of decision 16 April 2024
FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 381
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 301.9
X 381 Minus Y 301.9 = (A) 79.1
(A) 79.1 Divided by Y 301.9 = (B) 0.2620
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.3120
Last registered rent* £467 Multiplied by (C) = £612.70 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £613
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £613 Per month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference : LON/00AX/F77/2024/0063
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 34 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 12 December 2024
Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 16 April 2024 Hearing
remote on the papers
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no-one requested the same. The documents that I was referred to were in an electronic bundle the contents of which we have recorded. The registered rent with effect from 16 April 2024 is £613 per month.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background
1. On 17 February 2023 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £499.19 per month for the above property.
2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £467 per month which had been registered by the rent officer on 20 May 2021 with effect from 19 July 2021.
3. On 16 November 2023, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £609 per month with effect from the same date.
4. The tenant objected to the registered rent on 12 December 2023.
5. The tribunal issued Directions on 21 February 2024. No written representations were received from or on behalf of either the landlord or the tenant.
6. The tenant occupies under a shared ownership lease from 23 September 1983 and currently owns a 25% share.
7. I have viewed the locality on streetview.
The Evidence
8. The property is a terrace house built c1930 in a residential road of similar properties, about a mile and a half from the railway station. The accommodation comprises four rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc, the front garden has been surfaced to provide off road parking
9. The tenant has a full repairing lease.
The Law
10. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. The Tribunal is unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.
11. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:
That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and
That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.
Valuation 12. In the first instance I determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms considered usual for such an open market letting. As no evidence had been provided by either party I relied on my own general knowledge of rental values in Surbiton and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £2000 per month.
13. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £2000 to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £600 to reflect the full repairing obligations of the tenant.
14. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £1400 per month. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar properties in Greater London and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The uncapped fair rent is £920 per month to which must be added £9.42 for insurance and management. Deducting the tenant’s share of 25% gives an uncapped fair rent of £692.35. per month
Decision
15. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by me, for the purposes of section 70, is above the maximum fair rent of £613 per month calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. Therefore, the rent will be capped under the provisions of the Order.
19. Accordingly, the sum of £613 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 16 April 2024 being the date of my decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 16 April 2024
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application- for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the [RESPONDENT] 1988 or the Local Government and [RESPONDENT] 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Capped Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Capped Fair Rent for Social Housing Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Capped Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Capped Fair Rent for Tenancy Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination Under the Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Capped Fair Rent for Residential Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Capped Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Acts Order
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Capped Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Capped Fair Rent for Social Landlord's Tenan…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a capped fair rent under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- The rent is calculated according to the relevant order to ensure fairness.
- Previous similar cases have consistently supported the tenant's right to a capped fair rent.
- The court recognizes the statutory provisions designed to protect tenants from unfair rent increases.
- The Maximum Fair Rent Order provides a clear framework for determining fair rent levels.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The fair rent for a property was capped at £613 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court used the formula under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to determine the fair rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument focused on the calculation of the maximum fair rent using the specified formula.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be capped according to the formula under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the property's condition, location, and the previous registered rent.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
