Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Property
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a rental property in London. They considered factors like the Retail Price Index and the condition of the property to determine the fair rent. The decision was made by a person and Mr a person on February 21, 2020.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that is calculated according to the Retail Price Index and the conditions of the property.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property in accordance with the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property located in London, SE21 8LD, considering the Retail Price Index and the conditions of the property. The decision was made by Mr Anthony Harris and Mr Leslie Packer on February 21, 2020.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AY/F77/2019/0226
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 48 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord Peabody (Registered Charity)
Tenant [NAME]. [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is 192.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 21 February 2020
3. The amount for services is 6.72 Per Week
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
N/A Per
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
None
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £245.00 per Week including £6.72 per Week for services (variable).
[NAME] [NAME] of decision Friday 21st February 2020
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 291.9
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 275.1
X 291.9 Minus Y 275.1 = (A) 16.8
(A) 16.8 Divided by Y 275.1 = (B) 0.061068
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 - NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.111069
Last registered rent* 172.50 Multiplied by (C) = 191.66 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 192.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £192.00 Per Week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : KA/LON/00AY/F77/2019/0226 Property : 48 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Landlord : Peabody Representative : None Tenant : Mrs WE [COUNSEL] : In Person Type of Application : Determination of a fair rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal Members :
Mr [NAME] [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision :
21 February 2020
Date of Reasons :
21 February 2020
REASONS
2
Background
1. On 3 October 2019, the landlord applied for registration of a fair rent of £190.15 per week including a noted amount for services of £6.72 per week.
2. The Rent Officer registered a rent of £191.50 per week including services of £6.72. The rent is not registered as variable. The rent was registered on 6 November 2019 and is effective from the same date.
3. The tenant objected to the registered rent by letter dated 29 November 2019 and the matter was referred to the Tribunal.
4. The Tribunal issued directions on 19 December 2019 for proceeding initially on the basis of written representations only without an inspection during the week commencing on 17 February 2020 but with either party able to request an inspection or hearing. No requests were made and the Tenant made written representations.
Evidence
The Landlord’s Case
5. No evidence was submitted by the landlord. The tribunal had regard to the initial application for a registered rent and the service charge schedule submitted with it.
The Tenant’s case
6. The Tenant wrote to the tribunal setting out various personal circumstances which the tribunal is unable to take into account in assessing the level of fair rent.
Inspection
7. There was no inspection and the tribunal dealt with the matter on the papers. The tribunal also relied on its knowledge and experience.
The Law
8. When determining a fair rent, the Tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, has regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property.
3 9. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasized that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property.
10. The rent has been previously registered and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 therefore applies.
Discussion and Valuation
11. No evidence was supplied by either party and the tribunal therefore relied on its knowledge and experience of such flats in assessing the rent in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act. The tribunal considers that if this flat were to be let in the open market on ordinary assured shorthold tenancy terms with the usual carpets curtains and white goods. it would attract a rent of £380 per week.
12. Relying on its knowledge and experience in the absence of any evidence from the parties the tribunal considers the appropriate deduction for conditions and tenancy terms to be 20%.
13. The Tribunal found that there was substantial scarcity of letting property in the locality of Greater London and using its knowledge and experience made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent. The calculation of the s70 rent is set out below.
per week Market rent 380.00 £ less condition 20% 76.00 -£ 304.00 £ less scarcity 20% 60.80 -£ Fair rent 243.20 £ Rounded to 245.00 £
Capped rent
4 14. In accordance with the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 the maximum rent is the previous registered rent increased in accordance with the Order which provides for the previous rent to be increased by the percentage increase in the retail prices index plus 5% if the application is a second or later application since 1 February 1999.
15. The retail prices index figure to be used is the figure published in the month before the decision. The decision was made in February, and the figure published in January is that for December which was 291.9 and which is the upper figure to be used. The index at the date of the last registration was 275.1. Applying the formula produces a maximum fair rent of £192 per week which is below the s70 rent of £245.00 per week and therefore the capped rent of £192.00 per week is to be registered.
16. The effective date is the date of the decision.
17. The tribunal notes from the papers that the rent paid by the tenant is below the previous registered rent. A registered rent is the maximum rent which a landlord can charge and does not necessarily reflect the figure which the landlord will charge following this registration. This is a matter to be agreed between the landlord and tenant.
[NAME] [NAME] OF APPEAL
• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.
• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
• The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
• If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
5 • The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Condition and Responsibili…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy at £4717.50 Per Half Year
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Using Capping Formula
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent is determined by the Tribunal considering the property's condition.
- The fair rent reflects current market conditions.
- The fair rent is calculated according to the Retail Price Index.
- The fair rent takes into account necessary repairs and maintenance.
- The fair rent is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The fair rent is capped according to the Rent Acts without additional considerations.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £192.00 per week for the rental property.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a landlord and a tenant.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Retail Price Index and the condition of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the calculation of the fair rent based on the Retail Price Index.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, who objected to the registered rent.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the Retail Price Index and the condition of their property when disputing a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written representations and the application for registration of a fair rent were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving disputes over fair rent.
