VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenant Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £168 per week for a tenant's property, following the formula for calculating the maximum fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair rentmaximum fair renttenancy agreement

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, applying the formula for calculating the maximum fair rent.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £168 per week for a tenant's property, applying the formula for calculating the maximum fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.

LON/00AY/F77/2025/0150

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT] c/o [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £168 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 15 October 2025

3. The amount for services is 19.31 Per Week

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

None

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

The Tribunal determines that the amount for services is £19.31 per week

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £384 per week.

(b)

[NAME] of decision 15 October 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 407.7

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 317.7

X 407.7 Minus Y 317.7 = (A) 90

(A) 90 Divided by Y 3§7.7 = (B) 0.24

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 - NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) N/A

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.29

Last registered rent* 130 Multiplied by (C) = 167.7 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 168

Variable service charge No If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = 168 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AY/F77/2025/0150

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] c/o [NAME] of Landlord’s Objection : 24 February 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 15 October 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £168 per calendar week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 15 October 2025, being the date, the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

2. In essence, this was an objection on behalf of the Landlord in connection with the amount attributable to services in the Rent Register and this matter will be considered in the decision below.

3. The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection.to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. The Tribunal considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and the Rent Officer with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal did not receive completed Reply Statements from the parties nor any comparable evidence of rental levels in the area. The Tribunal had before it, the Rent Officers two Registrations and calculations for the most recent registration on the 10 January 2024 to take effect on that date.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of the Landlords evidence and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Waterloo area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £600 per week. (£2,600 per month) From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Terms of tenancy agreement, no white goods, no carpets or curtains. This equates to approximately 20%

6. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity at 20%

7. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent £600 pw

Less

approx. 20% £120

3

£480

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£96

£384 pw

Decision

8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £384 per calendar week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £168 per calendar week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.

9. In this case therefore the lower rent of 168 per calendar week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.

10. In a letter dated 20 November 2024 and subsequent email to the Rent Officer, the Landlord has made an objection in connection with amount attributed to service charges for the block which contains 66 flats. Based upon the service charge schedule the Tribunal agrees with the landlord and the costs for the lift are to be included. Therefore, the service charge cost for the property is £19.31 per week. This is not considered a variable service charge and this matter is set out in the Tribunal’s decision.

11. It is often the case that market rents are in excess of those that maybe charged by social landlord’s as it is a significant part of their remit to provide affordable housing. As such depending on the type of tenancy agreement their calculation of rent is either at a percentage of market rent or by way of index. Comparison is made with the open market rather than limited to other properties which are offered by social housing providers. It is assumed that the landlord will by usual convention of social landlord’s not seek to increase the rent proposed in its original notice as a result of this determination.

Chairman: [NAME]: 15 October 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

4 These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent is capped by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, resulting in a lower registered rent.
  • The Tribunal used its expert knowledge of rental values in the area to determine the open market rent.
  • Adjustments were made to the market rent due to the tenancy agreement's terms, such as the absence of white goods, carpets, or curtains.
  • An adjustment was made for scarcity in the housing market.
  • The landlord's objection regarding the inclusion of lift costs in service charges was accepted.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent of £168 per week for a tenant's property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used the formula for calculating the maximum fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the formula for calculating the maximum fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also have their fair rent determined using the same formula.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the property and the tenancy agreement mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.