VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £1040 per month. This decision was based on the Rent Act 1977 and took into account the Retail Price Index and the previous registered rent.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977, taking into account the Retail Price Index and previous registered rent.

Topics

fair rentRetail Price Indexprevious registered rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal sets a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering the Retail Price Index and previous registered rent.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, setting the rent at £1040 per month, effective from 23 August 2022. The calculation considered the Retail Price Index and the previous registered rent.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00BA/F77/2022/0100

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 79 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]

[APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £1040 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 23 August 2022

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £ 1181.50 per month prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 23 August 2022

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 340

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 292.7

X 340 Minus Y 292.7 = (A) 47.3

(A) 47.3 Divided by Y 292.7 = (B) 0.1616

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.2116

Last registered rent* £975 Multiplied by (C) = £1181.31 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £1181.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1181.50 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The calculation takes into account the Retail Price Index.
  • Previous registered rent is considered in the calculation.
  • Relevant orders under the Rent Act 1977 are taken into consideration.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No specific losing patterns identified in the provided cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent for a property at £1040 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used the Rent Act 1977 to calculate the fair rent, considering the Retail Price Index and the previous registered rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The calculation method under the Rent Act 1977 was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the same factors when seeking a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Previous registered rent and the Retail Price Index were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to higher courts.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.