VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) has set a new fair rent of £526 per month for a property, effective from 10th March 2022, under the Rent Act 1977. The decision took into account past rent payments and necessary repairs to the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977, taking into account the Retail Price Index and previous registered rents.

Topics

fair rentrent act 1977retail price index

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal sets a new fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering past rent payments and necessary repairs.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a new fair rent of £526 per month for a property, effective from 10th March 2022, under the Rent Act 1977, considering past rent payments and necessary repairs.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AZ/F77/2020/0134

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 6a [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord [NAME] (Registered Charity)

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] and Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £526 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 10th March 2022

3. The amount for services is Nil Per n/a

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Nil Per n/a

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent iis not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf) 7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

The tenants moved to the subject property in December 2014 from a dwelling owned by the same Landlord on the basis they would return to the original property after improvements were completed. The tribunal understand the tenants decided to stay at the subject property and have paid a rent of £609 per month from or around 2016. This exceeded the registered rent of £338.50 which was registered and effective from 4th March 2009. After inspection of the subject property the tribunal is of the opinion that the works carried to the subject property by the landlord constitute repairs rather improvements. Some of the works were necessary to remedy damage caused by subsidence to the property. The tribunal are unable to identify any rental increase as a consequence of the landlords works and therefore there is no justification for removal of the capping provisions.

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ 648.00 per month including £ nil per month for services

[NAME] of decision 10th March 2022

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 317.7

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 211.3

X 317.7 Minus Y 211.3 = (A) 106.4

(A) 106.4 Divided by Y 21.3 = (B) 0.5035

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.553549

Last registered rent* 338.5 Multiplied by (C) = 525.86 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £526.00

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services N/a

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £526 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The calculation takes into account the Retail Price Index.
  • Previous registered rents are considered in the calculation.
  • The rent is set according to relevant regulations and orders.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new fair rent of £526 per month for a property, effective from 10th March 2022.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977, considering past rent payments and necessary repairs to the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need to consider past rent payments and necessary repairs to the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is fair according to the Rent Act 1977.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Past rent payments and records of necessary repairs to the property mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it's recommended to get a solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.