VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Under Housing Act

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the a person. They set the rent at £1,500 per month starting from January 1, 2024, taking into account the property's current condition without considering any improvements made by the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under the relevant tenancy legislation, the market rent is determined based on the property's current condition, excluding any improvements made by the tenant.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The determination excludes certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant and reductions due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal set the rent at £1,500 per month, effective from January 1, 2024, reflecting the property's condition without recent refurbishment.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent at £1,500 per month effective from 1 January 2024, reflecting the property's condition without improvements.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AC/MNR/2024/0029

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

[NAME] 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 21 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT] 140 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1500.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 January 2024

3. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 June 1993

4. Length of the term or rental period monthly

5. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 applies

6. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

7. Description of premises Purpose built ground floor flat in two storey semi-detached building c1930 comprising three rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc.

Chairman E [NAME] of Decision 17 April 2024

1

Case Reference : LON/00AC/MNR/2024/0029

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : 21 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

: [RESPONDENT] of [NAME] : Determination of the market rent under Section 14 [NAME]

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 17 April 2024 Hearing Remote on the papers

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

The market rent is £1,500 per month with effect from 1 January 2024.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background

1. On 10 December 2023 the tenant referred to the Tribunal a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the [NAME].

2. The landlord's notice, which was served on 1 November 2023, proposed a rent of £1,700 per month with effect from 1 January 2024 in place of the existing rent of £1450 per month.

3. There was no tenancy agreement however a letter from the previous managing agent confirmed that Ms [APPELLANT] had taken up occupation on 1 June 1993.

4. Directions were issued by the tribunal on 22 February 2024.

5. Prior to the hearing the tenant sent brief submissions to the tribunal and copied them to the landlord’s agent, no representations were made by or on behalf of the landlord. The Evidence 6. The flat is on the ground floor of a purpose built two storey semi- detached block constructed c1930. The flat has the benefit of front and back gardens.

7. The tenant in written submissions, stated that the flat had not been refurbished during her tenancy. She had looked at the details of flats on the market and noted that the bathrooms and kitchens were of a much higher standard than her own, the comparables appeared to be in good decorative order. The kitchen and bathroom here provided the bare minimum of facilities. The law

8. In accordance with the terms of section 14 [NAME] I proceeded to determine the rent at which I considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

9. In so doing I, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act or any diminution in value due to the tenant not complying with the terms of the tenancy and also any items of disrepair which either the tenant had not reported to the landlord or had not allowed access for the landlord to carry out the necessary repairs.

3

Valuation

10. In coming to my decision, I relied on my own general knowledge of houses in North Finchley since neither party had provided any comparable evidence.

11. I found that the open market rent of the property if modernised would be £1700 per month however since the flat has not been refurbished in the preceding thirty years the open market rent of the flat in its present condition is determined at £1,500 per month to reflect the dated kitchen and bathroom

The decision 12. The rent of £1,500 per month is effective from 1 January 2024 in accordance with the landlord’s notice.

Chairman: [NAME]: 17 April 2024

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

I. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-[NAME]-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper- tribunal-lands-chamber II. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

III. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

IV. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the [NAME] or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.

4

[NAME]

14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely—

5 (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements…. (7)Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal … shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.

6

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent based on its general knowledge of local properties, as neither party provided comparable evidence.
  • The tenant's flat had not been refurbished for thirty years, justifying a lower market rent.
  • The dated kitchen and bathroom facilities contributed to a lower valuation of the property.
  • The tribunal disregarded any tenant improvements when determining the rent.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's proposed rent of £1,700 per month was not accepted for the property in its current condition.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The market rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £1,500 per month starting from January 1, 2024.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the condition of the property without improvements, setting the rent at £1,500 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property without improvements, leading to a rent of £1,500 per month.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was set lower than what the landlord proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined based on the condition of the property without considering any improvements made by the tenant.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The condition of the property and the lack of recent refurbishments were key factors in determining the rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations under assured periodic tenancies.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.