VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £297 per week, effective from April 1, 2024, after considering comparable evidence and local rental values.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal based on comparable evidence and local rental values.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the nature of the tenancy, the timing of the application, and the terms of the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and local rental values.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new rent of £297 per week for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from April 1, 2024, based on comparable evidence and local rental values.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00AA/MNR/2024/0101

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr C Norman FRICS

Landlord The [RESPONDENT] 80 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 297 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible

Per

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 4 July 2016

6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord structure /services. Tenant internal repairs/redecoration

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises Fourth floor bedsit with kitchen and bathroom

Chairman Mr [NAME] of Decision 4 September 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

1

Case Reference

: GB/LON/00AA/MNR/2024/0101

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 26 February 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 4 September 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £297 per week with effect from 1 April 2024. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 19 February 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 276.65 in place of the existing rent of £ 256.87 per week to take effect from 1 April 2024.

2. On 26 February 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 26 February 2024.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and/the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £330 week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

The tenant’s internal repairing and redecorating liability

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per week Market Rent

£330

Less The tenant’s internal repairing ) and

) approx. 10% redecorating liability

)

£33

£297

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £297 per week.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

3

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £297 per week.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £297 to take effect on 1 April 2024 this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: Mr C Norman FRICS Date: 4 September 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is adjusted based on the condition of the property.
  • The rent is determined based on comparable evidence from the local market.
  • The rent reflects the fair market value adjusted for the property's condition.
  • The rent is set according to the tenant's ability to pay.
  • The rent is determined according to the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £297 per week for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and local rental values.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparable evidence and local rental values.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair rent determination through the Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and local rental values were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed according to the appeal provisions outlined in the judgment.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.