Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a new monthly rent of £1,600 for an assured periodic tenancy, rejecting the landlord's proposal for a higher rent. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant may refer a landlord's notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal for determination of a fair market rent.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal can also consider a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair market rent of £1,600 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, rejecting the landlord's proposed increase of £1,900 per month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/43UK/MNR/2022/0147
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 28 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Judge [NAME]
Landlord [NAME] c/o [NAME], [COMPANY], 26 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] & Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1600.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13 December 2022
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 13 August 2021
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises Semi-detached Chalet Bungalow comprising Lounge, Kitchen, 3 bedrooms, Bathroom, Gardens.
[NAME] of Decision 27 February 2023
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/43UK/MNR/2022/0147 Property : 28 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant Tenants : Ms [COUNSEL] & Mr [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : [NAME]/ Legal Forensics Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] Judge [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :
27th February 2023
DECISION
CHI/43UK/MNR/2022/0147
2
Summary of Decision 1. On 27th February 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,600 per month to take effect from 13th December 2022. Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 9th November 2022 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,900 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,300 per month to take effect from 13th December 2022. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On 10th December 2022 the Tenants applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/ or hearing.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 6th January 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. The Landlord submitted detailed papers by the specified date setting out their respective case. The papers were also copied to the Tenants.
8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 27th February 2023 based on the written representations received. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet the property comprises a semi-detached bungalow of brick and render elevations beneath a tiled roof, located in the village of Smallfield which is about 6 miles northeast of Crawley. There are a few local amenities including a shop and school, but main shopping and educational facilities are a distance away. Horley station is 15 minutes away by car.
10. The accommodation has been extended into the roof space and now comprises a Living Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms and a Bathroom all at ground level. At first floor level there is a large open space albeit with sloping ceilings.
CHI/43UK/MNR/2022/0147
3 11. Outside there are gardens front and rear and driveway parking. There is a detached garage which is excluded from the tenancy. The Landlord is required to give notice to access the Garage.
12. The property has central heating and double-glazed windows. It is stated that one room is unheated. Carpets, curtains and white goods are included in the tenancy. Submissions 13. The initial tenancy began on 13th August 2021 at a rent of £1,300 per month.
14. The Landlord provided two opinions of value from local Agents suggesting a rent of £1,800 and £1,875 per month based on a verbal description of the property. The Landlord also provided details of other bungalows in the area available to rent at figures between £1,600 and £2,500 per month. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his [NAME], or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his [NAME] being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and
CHI/43UK/MNR/2022/0147
4 (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation 15. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
16. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy.
17. The Tribunal carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the general area of Horley the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,600 per month.
18. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 19. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,600 per month.
20. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,600 per month should take effect from 13th December 2022, this being the date specified in the original notice.
CHI/43UK/MNR/2022/0147
5
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal [NAME] to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets new market rent for property based on condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Tenant Imp…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Necessary Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
- The tenant can refer a landlord's rent increase notice to the Tribunal for determination.
- The Tribunal considers the property's condition and the terms of the tenancy agreement.
- The tenant's improvements and the need for repairs in the property are taken into account.
- The tenant's entitlement to a fair market rent is supported by the Housing Act 1988.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenancy agreement explicitly excludes referrals to the Tribunal regarding rent increases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new market rent of £1,600 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the fair market rent for the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the fair market rent for the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can refer a landlord's notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence and documents such as rental valuations and property descriptions were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
