VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets £75.77 Weekly Rent for Assured Tenancy in Newcastle

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the weekly rent at £75.77, which excludes water rates and council tax but includes service charges. This decision took effect on April 7, 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to statutory requirements.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination excludes certain factors such as the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant, increases in value due to improvements made by the tenant, and decreases in value due to the tenant's non-compliance with the tenancy terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, excluding certain costs.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £75.77 per week, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges. The decision took effect on 7 April 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CJ/MNR/2025/0717

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], Newcastle upon Tyne [POSTCODE]

I Jefferson K [NAME] P O Box 2070, Preston [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £75.77 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 7 April 2025

3. The amount included for services is:

£25.77 Per week

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 4 June 2019

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Standard, as S11 of Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Unfurnished.

9. Description of premises Fourth Floor access Maisonette, 1 Reception, Kitchen, on 4th Floor, 2 Bedrooms and Bathroom to 3F. Radiator central heating, double-glazing. Significant long standing (2 years) water leak into Living Room rendering Living Room uninhabitable.

Chairman I Jefferson Date of Decision 29 May 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal set the rent for the property at £75.77 per week.
  • The decision on the rent took effect from April 7, 2025.
  • The rent included £25.77 per week for services.
  • The premises had a significant long-standing water leak, making the living room uninhabitable.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent at £75.77 per week for an assured periodic tenancy.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was over the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy, specifically whether the rent should include service charges.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £75.77 per week, including service charges of £25.77 per week, following the requirements of the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14, was applied to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14, to set the rent at £75.77 per week, including service charges.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the person who brought the case, confirming the rent at £75.77 per week.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

For someone in a similar situation, the decision confirms that the rent for an assured periodic tenancy can be set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.