
Benefits & Social Security judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The a person Tribunal ruled that a a person person’s a person should receive their a person (a person) death benefit over another claimant, as the Minister did not follow proper procedures in awarding it to someone else first.
The Social Security Tribunal denied a claimant's request to appeal a denial of a CPP disability pension. The claimant argued they had made sufficient contributions but did not meet the legal criteria for appeal.
In this a person case, the Social Security Tribunal partially allowed a worker's appeal against the decision denying benefits. The tribunal found that the lower court had erred in assessing the worker's efforts to return to work and set stricter job search requirements than necessary.
A person applied for an earlier start date for their a person a person due to being incapacitated after their spouse's death. However, the Social Security Tribunal found that they did not meet the strict requirements for proving incapacity and dismissed the appeal.
The Social Security Tribunal ruled that the Commission could use a 72-month time limit to reconsider a claimant's claim for Employment Insurance benefits if it can reasonably find that a false or misleading statement was made. The claimant's appeal was dismissed.
In this case, the Social Security Tribunal reviewed and corrected an error made during the calculation of a claimant’s weekly Employment Insurance benefit amount. The correct rate was determined to be $524.00 per week.
The Social Security Tribunal of Canada dismissed an appeal by a claimant who argued against the Employment Insurance Commission's use of a 72-month period to reconsider his sickness benefits. The tribunal ruled that the Commission could reasonably find there was a false or misleading statement, even if it wasn't knowingly made.
The Federal Court granted a judicial review, overturning a decision on the eligibility of a worker for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB). The court found the decision-maker's ruling unreasonable because it did not adequately consider the worker's evidence and arguments.
A claimant applied for leave to appeal a decision about when their a person retirement pension should start. The Social Security Tribunal refused permission because there was no new evidence or clear mistake by the lower tribunal.
The Social Security Tribunal ruled that vacation pay received after a layoff does not qualify for exemption under section 77.997 of the EI Regulations. The decision overturned a previous ruling by the General Division.
The Social Security Tribunal of Canada reversed a decision that vacation pay received during planned leave after layoff does not qualify for exemption under section 77.997 of the Employment Insurance Regulations. The earnings must be allocated based on normal weekly earnings from August 4 to 30, 2025.