
Benefits & Social Security judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
A court found an error in how Employment Insurance (EI) benefits were reviewed by the Canada Employment Insurance Commission. The Appeal Division corrected this mistake, allowing the claimant to keep their EI benefits without having to repay them.
The Social Security Tribunal dismissed an appeal by an elderly man seeking a full Old Age Security (OAS) pension. The tribunal found that while the claimant had lived in Canada during certain periods, he did not meet the residency requirements to qualify for a full OAS pension. He was eligible for partial benefits.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision denying eligibility for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB). The court ruled that the applicant had not provided enough evidence to prove they met the income requirement of at least $5,000 in the relevant period.
The Federal Court overturned a decision by the Canada Revenue Agency (a person) regarding eligibility for emergency benefits because a person's review process was unfair and denied the applicant an adequate chance to present their case.
The Federal Court dismissed an appeal against a decision denying eligibility for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB). The court found that the claimant failed to provide adequate proof of income, as required by the CERB eligibility criteria.
The Federal Court dismissed an application by a self-represented litigant challenging the Canada Revenue Agency’s (a person) decision regarding eligibility for CERB, CRB, and CRSB. The court found that the a person process was fair and its decision reasonable based on the evidence provided.
In a recent Employment Insurance case, the Social Security Tribunal ruled that settlement proceeds received by an employee after termination are considered earnings under the Employment Insurance Act. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the employee did not provide sufficient evidence to prove that the settlement proceeds were not for loss of income due to termination.
A self-employed individual challenged a a person decision denying their eligibility for a person. The Federal Court dismissed this challenge, finding that the agent's determination was reasonable and procedurally fair according to the relevant laws and evidence submitted.
The Federal Court ruled in favour of a person who received Employment Insurance benefits and then applied for the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB). The court found that the Canada Revenue Agency’s decision to deny CRB eligibility based on an incorrect interpretation of the law was unreasonable.
A terminated employee appealed against the Social Security Tribunal’s ruling that their settlement payment was considered employment income for EI purposes. The Appeal Division dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence to prove the payment was not compensation for lost wages or benefits.
The Federal Court granted a request for judicial review, ruling that the Officer's decision on CRB eligibility was unreasonable because it did not properly interpret the relevant legislation.