
General & Other judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In a recent BC Small Claims case, the Civil Resolution Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant $1,888.24, including $1,500 as debt, $213.24 in pre-judgment interest, and $175 in CRT fees, despite the respondent's financial difficulties.
The Federal Court of Appeal rejected an appeal challenging trademark infringement claims. The court ruled that the trademark registrations were clearly descriptive and deceptively misdescriptive of the associated goods or services, violating the Trademarks Act.
In a recent Federal Court decision, the court dismissed the opposition to the registration of the trademark 'MASTER CHOCOLAT'. The court ruled that the opponent failed to prove that the trademark was not distinctive or that it would cause confusion with existing trademarks.
The Federal Court granted partial confidentiality for certain documents submitted by the respondent under the Competition Act, rejecting full sealing due to the lack of demonstrated serious risk to important interests.
The Federal Court approved a settlement in a class action lawsuit involving data breaches in government websites. The settlement recognizes the unauthorized access to personal and financial information of class members and grants compensation.
A member of a cooperative association challenged the unit allocation process, claiming it was unfair. The tribunal reviewed the evidence and concluded the process was fair and adhered to the association's policies, dismissing the claimant's request for a better unit.
The claimant provided bookkeeping services to the respondent and invoiced for the services. The respondent disputed the payment due to alleged errors and delays in communication. The Tribunal found the claimant partially successful and ordered the respondent to pay $630 for the bookkeeping services.
The claimant sued an auto technician for damaging her car's suspension airbag during an inspection. The court dismissed the claim because the claimant couldn't prove the technician was negligent.
In a recent decision, the Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed a claimant's request for the return of their deductible. The Tribunal found that the insurer's determination of the claimant's full responsibility for the accident was correct, and the claimant failed to prove that an unknown driver was involved in the accident.
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a law interrupting the process of redrawing electoral boundaries in Quebec is unconstitutional. The Court found that the law violated the right to vote under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The claimant asked for $5,000 to fix a bathroom that was renovated poorly. However, the Tribunal said there wasn't enough proof from experts to show the work was really bad, so they dismissed the claim.
In this case, a union successfully applied to expand its bargaining unit under the Canada Labour Code. The Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the expanded unit after confirming that the union had majority support among the employees to be included.