
General & Other judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Federal Court dismissed a motion brought by a self-represented litigant challenging procedural fairness in a judicial review application. The court found no evidence of bias or procedural unfairness.
The claimant successfully proved that the respondent was negligent in damaging its gas line. However, the tribunal found that some of the repair costs claimed by the claimant were unreasonable and reduced the amount accordingly.
In a recent case, an employer successfully recovered overpaid wages and the cost of a laptop and accessories from an employee. The Civil Resolution Tribunal found that the employee was unjustly enriched by the overpayment and failed to return the company property.
The claimant successfully sued the respondents for damages caused by trespassing on their property during driveway construction. The Tribunal ruled in favour of the claimant, ordering the respondents to pay for the damages.
An executor of a deceased person successfully claimed a credit refund from a respondent in a small claims case. However, the claim for stress damages and time spent on the claim was dismissed.
A retired a person member applied for judicial review after being denied an extension beyond their mandatory retirement age. The Federal Court found that the decision to deny this extension was reasonable based on the absence of special needs or operational demands requiring continued service.
The Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled in favour of the claimant, who successfully argued that the respondent breached a verbal contract by failing to deliver well testing results in a timely manner. The claimant was awarded a refund of $1,470.85.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review application filed by a military personnel seeking an extension of his compulsory retirement age. The court ruled that the decision was reasonable and procedurally fair.
In a recent case, the Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled that a respondent who contracted with a service provider without disclosing their connection to a corporation was personally liable for the resulting invoice. The decision underscores the necessity of transparency in contractual agreements.
The claimant bought a shipping container from the respondent but couldn't pick it up because it wasn't accessible as promised. The Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled in favour of the claimant, rescinding the contract and ordering the respondent to return the deposit and pay for the shipping company's failed delivery attempt.
The Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed a worker's claim for unpaid wages because the worker could not provide proof of an employment contract or detailed work records. The employer argued the worker was hired by a subcontractor, not directly by them.