
General & Other judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In this case, a Federal Court judge approved a request by a person for a production order under the a person Act. The order was granted to help investigate a potential threat to national security, as there were reasonable grounds to believe specific information could assist in the investigation.
A member of a cooperative association asked for reimbursement for unapproved flooring changes and requested the reversal of a charge. The tribunal decided that the cooperative was not required to reimburse the member for the flooring changes but ordered the charge to be reversed.
In a recent decision, the Canada Industrial Relations Board certified a trade union as the bargaining agent for a specific group of employees. This certification allows the union to negotiate on behalf of the employees in the defined unit.
The Canada Industrial Relations Board decided that a new trade union could become the bargaining agent for a group of workers after a majority of the workers voted in favour of the change during a secret ballot vote.
The claimant argued that a credit card company violated the Business Practices Consumer Protection Act by engaging in deceptive practices. The tribunal found no evidence supporting the claim and dismissed the case.
The claimant sued the respondent for damaging a gas line. The respondent admitted to the damage but argued the repair costs were too high. The tribunal ruled the respondent was liable but only awarded part of the claimed repair costs.
In a recent decision, the Canada Industrial Relations Board certified a trade union as the bargaining agent for a specific group of employees. The board considered various factors including the community of interest among the employees and their expressed wishes.
In a case involving alleged copyright infringement, the Federal Court rejected the defendant's request for summary judgment. The court found that there were unresolved questions about whether the plaintiffs had the legal right to bring their claims.
In a recent copyright infringement case, the Federal Court dismissed the defendant's motion for summary judgment and to strike the amended statement of claim. The court ruled that the defendant did not prove that there was no genuine issue for trial, thus rejecting the motion.
In this case, a contractor sought payment for completed landscaping work, but the client disputed the quality of the work and claimed deficiencies. The Civil Resolution Tribunal reviewed the evidence and determined that the contractor was entitled to payment, minus deductions for proven deficiencies.
The Federal Court has ruled that the winning side in a legal dispute is entitled to be reimbursed for their expenses, known as 'costs'. In this case, the court awarded these costs to the successful party based on the rules set out by the Federal Courts Rules.