
General & Other judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
A contractor successfully recovered payment for electrical work from a client who could not afford to pay, despite the client's financial difficulties. The Tribunal awarded the full amount plus interest and fees.
The dispute was about an unpaid invoice for fireplace installation. The respondents claimed the work was deficient and caused damage. The Tribunal found the respondents failed to prove the work was deficient and ordered them to pay the full invoice amount.
In a recent decision, the Civil Resolution Tribunal determined that the injuries sustained by the claimant in a motor vehicle accident were minor. The claimant argued that their injuries were non-minor, but the tribunal found that the injuries were pain syndromes and thus presumed minor.
The claimant asked for refunds for three contracts with the respondent, arguing that the respondent failed to fulfill the contractual obligations. The tribunal reviewed the evidence and granted partial refunds based on the services provided.
In a recent case, the Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled that a subcontractor was not obligated to provide ongoing support to a homeowner unless there was an explicit agreement in the contract. The claimant's breach of contract claim was dismissed.
The Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board ruled on a case where a worker was suspended without pay and later terminated. The employer argued the Board lacked jurisdiction over the termination because the suspension was moot. However, the Board found it had jurisdiction over the termination grievance.
The Canada Industrial Relations Board certified a trade union as the bargaining agent for a group of employees working in security screening at an airport. This decision was made after a majority of the employees expressed a desire to be represented by the union.
The Civil Resolution Tribunal decided on a dispute over the ownership of a shared pet dog. The claimant sought compensation for expenses incurred while caring for the dog, which was granted by the court.
The Civil Resolution Tribunal granted a refund to the claimant for breach of contract regarding the delivery of a couch. The claimant purchased a couch from the respondent, but the couch was delivered late and in the wrong color. The claimant refused the couch and sought a refund and damages. The Tribunal found that the respondent breached the contract and ordered a refund of $2,600, pre-judgment interest, and CRT fees.
The claimant sued the respondents for breaches of contract concerning the condition of a purchased home, including issues with a hot tub, cooktop, and cleaning. The Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed the claim because the claimant did not provide enough evidence to prove the issues existed at the time of sale.