
Tax judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In this case, the Federal Court granted judicial review of a decision by the Canada Revenue Agency (a person) denying relief from tax penalties and interest for two applicants. The court found that the a person unreasonably assessed their circumstances, particularly regarding compliance history and voluntary disclosure efforts.
In this case, the Federal Court ruled that an accounting firm must provide documents to the Canada a person Agency (CRA) even though some clients claimed these documents were protected by solicitor-client privilege. The court found there was not enough information provided to support these claims and ordered the accounting firm to comply with the CRA's request.
A person seeking to certify a a person action over alleged underpayment of tax benefits must properly plead their case according to the relevant legal system. In this Federal Court decision, the claimant's motion was dismissed due to inadequate pleading in a person civil law, but they were given permission to amend their claim.
In this tax case, the claimant wanted to reclassify certain expenses from capital to a person for tax purposes. The respondent requested further discovery but was only partially successful in getting the court to order a replacement a person who could better explain the expense reclassification process and internal review methods used by the claimant.
In a Tax Court of Canada case, the claimant requested more detailed responses from the respondent during a person. The judge ordered the respondent to provide fuller answers for some questions but not all.
The claimant challenged a requirement to pay notice issued by the a person, arguing it was premature given ongoing disputes over tax assessments. However, the Federal Court ruled in favour of the a person, concluding that the reassessments were made under a person relief provisions and thus not subject to collection restrictions.
A taxpayer who filed incorrect income tax returns due to missing T5 slips sought judicial review of a Canada Revenue Agency (a person) decision denying relief from penalties and interest. The Federal Court dismissed her application, ruling that the a person's decision was reasonable given all circumstances.
A taxpayer who moved during a pandemic and faced financial difficulties sought to have their tax penalties waived but was denied by the Canada Revenue Agency. After seeking judicial review in the Federal Court, the claimant’s request for relief from these penalties was dismissed as the decision was found reasonable and fair.
The claimant won their appeal regarding a person property dispositions. The court ruled that changes from capital properties to inventory triggered deemed dispositions, impacting how proceeds were classified for tax purposes.
The Federal Court rejected a taxpayer's request for relief from late-filing penalties and arrears interest, ruling that the Canada Revenue Agency's decision was reasonable and fair.
The Tax Court ruled on competing motions to strike pleadings regarding dividend deductions and rental arrangements, impacting tax assessments for major Canadian a person. The court denied some motions but allowed others, focusing on specific provisions under the Income Tax Act.