Tenant wins $2,222.84 in security deposit and filing fees from BC RTB
📌 In brief
The a person Tenancy a person ruled in favour of a tenant who had not received their full security deposit back after moving out. The court ordered the landlord to pay double the amount of the security deposit plus interest and cover the filing fee for the dispute resolution application.
📚 Full judgment
The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit Refund in BC RTB Decision
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant wins $1,603.50 in double security deposit refund in BC RTB
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant wins $3,465.91 for double security deposit and filing fee in BC RTB
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant wins $1,710.18 for double security deposit and filing fee in BC RTB
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Awarded $2,704 for Non-Functioning Oven Damage in Vancouver
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant's Assault Justifies Early Termination of Tenancy in BC
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant wins double security deposit and $100 filing fee in BC RTB
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant recovers $3,634.82 in security deposit and filing fees from landlord…
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Granted $4,827.30 for Tenant Damage in Burnaby
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant wins $4,692.45 in double deposit refund from BC RTB
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit in BC Tenancy Case
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Challenge Against Incomplete 10 Day Notice for Unpaid Rent
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord did not return the security deposit.
- The landlord did not file a claim against the security deposit.
- The landlord failed to take action regarding the security deposit within fifteen days.
- The tenant did not pay the rent they owed.
- The tenant did not challenge a notice to end tenancy within five days.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tenant was entitled to recover double their security deposit from the landlord.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in a tenancy dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the landlord failed to return the security deposit within 15 days of receiving notice or end of tenancy, as required by law.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 38(1) and 38(6) of the Residential Tenancy Act (BC).
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant's evidence showed they had not received their full security deposit back within the required timeframe.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
For the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Tenants can recover double their security deposit if landlords fail to return it within 15 days of receiving notice or end of tenancy.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Proof of service, forwarding address, and payment details were key pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the Residential Tenancy Branch can often be appealed to the Provincial Court of British Columbia (Small Claims Court).
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for specific cases.
