VadeLab
AllowedResidential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia)·

Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit from Landlord

Case No. AnonDec-301488

📌 In brief

A tenant won a case against their landlord for not returning the security deposit on time. The judge ordered the landlord to pay double the amount of the deposit plus interest and cover the filing fees.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to recover double their security deposit plus interest if the landlord fails to return it or file a dispute resolution claim within fifteen days of receiving notice.

Topics

security depositstenancy disputes

Provisions

Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 38(1)Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 38(6)

📚 Full judgment

The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.

⚖️ View on the official court website ↗

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord did not return the security deposit within 15 days.
  • The landlord did not file a dispute resolution claim about the deposit within 15 days.
  • The landlord did not return the pet damage deposit within 15 days.
  • The tenant left the rental unit in an unclean condition.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant did not properly serve their application notice.
  • The tenant did not provide proper notice to end the tenancy.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in a dispute over a security deposit.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided in favour of the Tenant because the Landlord failed to return the security deposit within 15 days as required by law.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 38(1) and section 38(6) of the Residential Tenancy Act (BC).

What was the argument that mattered most?

The Tenant's argument that the Landlord failed to return the security deposit within the required timeframe.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

For the Tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

If a landlord fails to return a security deposit on time, they may be ordered to pay double the amount plus interest.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The proof of service and forwarding address form were key pieces of evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the Residential Tenancy Branch can often be appealed to the Provincial Court of British Columbia.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for specific cases.

Official source: Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) — this page does not reproduce the decision; it links to the court's own publication. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) (© Province of British Columbia). VadeLab reproduces no part of the decision text; the summary above is VadeLab's own material. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.