Landlord Wins Eviction Case Over Unpaid Rent
📌 In brief
The Landlord won an eviction case against the Tenant because the Tenant did not pay rent owed and failed to respond to a 10 Day Notice. The decision was made based on the Residential Tenancy Act, which allows landlords to obtain possession orders if tenants do not comply with notices.
📚 Full judgment
The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Order of Possession for Tenant's Failure to Pay Rent
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Order of Possession for Unpaid Rent
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Secures Order of Possession for Unpaid Rent
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit Return Against Landlord
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit from Landlord
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit Refund in Residential Tenancy Case
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant wins double security deposit and filing fees in dispute with landlor…
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit and Filing Fee Recovery
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Unpaid Rent Case: Tenant Owes $11,521.77
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) RTB Grants Landlord Order of Possession and Rent Award
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) RTB Grants Landlord Possession, Partially Rejects Rent Claim
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Possession Order, Rent Claim Rejected
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- A tenant did not pay the outstanding rent or dispute a 10 Day Notice within five days.
- A landlord did not return a security deposit within fifteen days.
- A landlord did not prove that the money claimed in a 10 Day Notice was actually owed.
- A landlord did not return or claim against security and pet damage deposits.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A landlord did not prove that the tenant failed to pay rent within five days of receiving a 10 Day Notice.
- A tenant tried to withhold rent or dispute a valid rent increase notice based on problems with older notices.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Landlord won an eviction case against the Tenant for unpaid rent.
Who was involved?
A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute over unpaid rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the Tenant failed to pay the rent or dispute the 10 Day Notice within five days as required by law.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 46, 53(2), 67, and 72 of the Residential Tenancy Act (BC) were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The Landlord's evidence showed that the Tenant did not pay rent or dispute the notice within five days.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the Landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
If a tenant fails to pay rent and disputes a 10 Day Notice within five days, they risk losing their tenancy.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The proof of service form, the 10 Day Notice, and the rental agreement were key pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the Residential Tenancy Branch can typically be appealed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult with a qualified lawyer for legal advice specific to your situation.