RTB Grants Landlord Order of Possession and Rent Award
📌 In brief
In this case, the Residential Tenancy Branch ruled in favour of the landlord who sought an Order of Possession due to unpaid rent and a Monetary Order for back rent. However, the claim for June’s rent was not granted at this time.
📖 Technical summary
The Landlord successfully obtained an Order of Possession and a Monetary Order for unpaid rent, but was denied recovery for June's rent.
📚 Full judgment
The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Possession Order, Rent Claim Rejected
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) RTB Grants Landlord Possession, Partially Rejects Rent Claim
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Awarded Compensation for Rental Unit Damages
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Residential Tenancy Branch Grants Partial Claim for Rental Issues
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Dispute Over Rent Increase Service and Notice Cancellation
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Residential Landlord Wins Claim for Unpaid Rent and Damages
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant and Landlord Reach Agreement on Rent and Repairs
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Order of Possession for Tenant's Failure to Pay Rent
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Eviction Case Over Unpaid Rent
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Order of Possession for Unpaid Rent
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Secures Order of Possession for Unpaid Rent
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Order of Possession Granted: Tenant Owes Unpaid Rent
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- When a landlord claims possession, the court tends to agree if the tenant did not pay rent or challenge a 10-day notice within five days.
- When a tenant claims their deposit, the court tends to agree if the landlord did not return the security or pet damage deposit within the required time.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- When a tenant tries to cancel a 10-day notice, the court tends to disagree if the tenant did not pay rent or dispute the notice within five days.
- When a tenant tries to withhold rent, the court tends to disagree if they based it on minor issues with old rent increase notices.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
Who was involved?
A landlord and tenants were involved in the dispute over unpaid rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the tenant failed to pay or dispute the 10 Day Notice within five days as required by law.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 46, 55, 67, and 72 of the Residential Tenancy Act (BC) were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The landlord's evidence showing non-payment within five days after service of the 10 Day Notice was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Tenants must pay rent on time and dispute notices promptly to avoid eviction.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Proof of service, tenancy agreement, 10 Day Notice, payment records were key.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the Residential Tenancy Branch can often be appealed to higher courts.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult with a qualified lawyer for legal advice and representation.