Order of Possession Granted: Tenant Owes Unpaid Rent
📌 In brief
A landlord successfully obtained an order from the a person to take possession of a rental unit because the tenant did not pay overdue rent or challenge the notice within the required timeframe. However, the landlord's request for additional financial compensation was denied.
📖 Technical summary
The Landlord's application for possession was granted, but monetary claims were dismissed.
📚 Full judgment
The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Residential Tenancy Decision: Landlord Wins Unpaid Rent Case
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit Claim Against Landlord
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Unpaid Rent Case: Tenant Owes $1,197.91
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Dispute Over Incomplete 10 Day Notice
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Secures Unpaid Rent Order from Tenant
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Unpaid Rent Case: Tenant Owes $11,521.77
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit Refund in Residential Tenancy Case
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit Return Against Landlord
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit from Landlord
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant Wins Double Security Deposit and Filing Fee Recovery
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Landlord Wins Order of Possession for Tenant's Failure to Pay Rent
- Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) Tenant wins double security deposit and filing fees in dispute with landlor…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The 10 Day Notice was properly served on the Tenant's door on May 10, 2026.
- The Tenant did not pay the rental arrears or dispute the notice within five days after receiving it.
- The Landlord is entitled to recover the $100.00 filing fee from the security deposit.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The service by posting to the door was insufficient for the monetary claims, leading to their dismissal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Landlord successfully obtained an Order of Possession to take control of the rental unit due to unpaid rent.
Who was involved?
A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute over unpaid rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court granted possession because the Tenant failed to pay overdue rent or challenge the notice within five days as required by law.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 46 and 55 of the Residential Tenancy Act (BC) were used to determine that the Landlord was entitled to an Order of Possession.
What argument mattered most?
The key point was whether the Tenant paid rent or disputed the notice within five days, which they did not do.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was in favour of the Landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
A tenant must pay overdue rent or dispute the notice within five days to avoid losing their rental unit.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The 10 Day Notice and proof that it was served properly were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the Residential Tenancy Branch can often be appealed to higher courts.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult with a legal professional for advice specific to your situation.