VadeLab
AllowedResidential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia)·

Landlord Granted $751.52 Unpaid Rent Order in Surrey

Case No. AnonDec-301301

📌 In brief

In this case, the landlord successfully obtained a monetary order for unpaid rent from the tenant. They were also permitted to use part of the tenant’s security deposit towards the outstanding balance. This decision was made by the a person in British Columbia.

Topics

unpaid rentsecurity deposits

Provisions

Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 26Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 38Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 67Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 72

📖 Technical summary

The claimant successfully obtained a monetary order for unpaid rent and was allowed to retain part of the security deposit.

📚 Full judgment

The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.

⚖️ View on the official court website ↗

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant failed to pay rent or utilities as agreed.
  • The tenant caused damage or left the rental unit unclean.
  • The landlord applied to claim against the security deposit within fifteen days.
  • The landlord failed to return the security deposit or file a dispute within 15 days.
  • The tenant failed to pay rent or dispute a notice within five days.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A party failed to serve required documents according to the Act and Rules.
  • There was no formal tenancy agreement established between both parties.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The landlord successfully obtained a monetary order for unpaid rent and was allowed to retain part of the tenant's security deposit.

Who was involved?

A landlord and tenants were involved in this case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided in favour of the landlord because the tenant failed to attend or provide evidence disputing the claim.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 26, 38, 67, and 72 of the Residential Tenancy Act (BC) were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The landlord's undisputed evidence showing unpaid rent was the central reasoning.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

If you are a landlord with an unpaid rent claim, you may be entitled to a monetary order and can apply the tenant's security deposit towards the outstanding balance.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The landlord provided a tenant ledger showing the outstanding balance of $966.00 for April 2026.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the Residential Tenancy Branch can often be appealed to the Provincial Court of British Columbia (Small Claims Court).

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for specific guidance on your situation.

Official source: Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) — this page does not reproduce the decision; it links to the court's own publication. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) (© Province of British Columbia). VadeLab reproduces no part of the decision text; the summary above is VadeLab's own material. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.