VadeLab
AllowedResidential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia)·

Landlord Wins Unpaid Rent Case: Tenant Owes $1,197.91

Case No. AnonDec-300778

📌 In brief

The landlord won a case against a tenant for unpaid rent in March 2026 after the tenant vacated without paying. The court ordered the tenant to pay $1,197.91, including part of their security deposit and filing fees.

Topics

unpaid rentsecurity deposits

Provisions

Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 26Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 38Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 67Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 72

📚 Full judgment

The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.

⚖️ View on the official court website ↗

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A landlord is favored if the tenant fails to pay rent.
  • A tenant is favored if the landlord fails to return the security deposit or file a claim within fifteen days.
  • A landlord is favored if the tenant leaves the rental unit in an unclean condition.
  • A landlord is favored if the tenant's non-compliance causes damage or loss.
  • A landlord is favored if they apply to claim against the security deposit for unpaid rent or cleaning costs within fifteen days.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A claim is dismissed if the party making it fails to provide sufficient evidence of serving necessary documents.
  • A claim is dismissed if the party making it fails to follow the required method for serving documents.
  • A claim for rent or compensation is dismissed if no formal tenancy agreement was established.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The landlord was granted a monetary order for unpaid rent and authorized to retain part of the tenant's security deposit.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute over unpaid rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that since the tenant vacated without paying March 2026 rent, the landlord could recover the amount plus retain part of the security deposit.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The landlord's undisputed testimony about the tenant vacating without paying rent was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

A landlord can seek unpaid rent and retain part of the security deposit if a tenant vacates without paying.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Proof of service, testimony about non-payment, and rental agreement details were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the Residential Tenancy Branch can typically be appealed to the Provincial Court of British Columbia (Small Claims Division).

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is recommended to consult with a qualified lawyer for advice on your specific situation.

Official source: Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) — this page does not reproduce the decision; it links to the court's own publication. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) (© Province of British Columbia). VadeLab reproduces no part of the decision text; the summary above is VadeLab's own material. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.