VadeLab
AllowedResidential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia)·

Residential Tenancy Decision: Landlord Wins Unpaid Rent Case

Case No. AnonDec-300981

📌 In brief

In this case, the Residential Tenancy Branch ruled in favour of the landlord who sought payment for unpaid rent and related charges. The tenant was ordered to pay the outstanding amount plus a filing fee.

Topics

unpaid rentsecurity deposit

Provisions

Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 67Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 38Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 72

📖 Technical summary

The landlord was granted a monetary order for unpaid rent, allowed to retain part of the tenant's security deposit, and authorized to recover the filing fee.

📚 Full judgment

The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.

⚖️ View on the official court website ↗

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant failed to pay rent or utilities as agreed.
  • The tenant caused damage or left the rental unit in an unclean condition.
  • The landlord made reasonable efforts to reduce their financial losses.
  • The landlord applied for a claim against the security deposit within the required time.
  • The landlord failed to repair an essential facility within a reasonable time.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The claimant did not properly serve required documents.
  • No formal tenancy agreement was established between the parties.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The court granted the landlord's request for a Monetary Order for unpaid rent, NSF fees, late payments, and parking fees.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute over unpaid rent and related charges.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant owed the landlord for unpaid rent and additional fees as per their agreement. The evidence supported this claim.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 67, 38, and 72 of the Residential Tenancy Act (BC) were applied to determine the outcome.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The landlord's evidence showing unpaid rent and fees was crucial in supporting their claim.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

If you are a landlord facing unpaid rent, you may be entitled to seek a Monetary Order through the Residential Tenancy Branch.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The 10 Day Notice and proof of service were important pieces of evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the Residential Tenancy Branch can typically be appealed to the BC Supreme Court.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is advisable to consult with a qualified lawyer to understand your rights and options in such cases.

Official source: Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) — this page does not reproduce the decision; it links to the court's own publication. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Residential Tenancy Branch (British Columbia) (© Province of British Columbia). VadeLab reproduces no part of the decision text; the summary above is VadeLab's own material. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.