
Tenancy & Housing judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In this case at the Tenancy Tribunal, the tenant claimed that the landlord had breached their obligations regarding a company and maintaining the property's condition. However, due to insufficient evidence provided by the tenant, including lack of independent witnesses or corroborating documents, the claim was dismissed.
In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal ruled that a tenant must pay the landlord $1,160.41 for unpaid rent and cleaning costs because the tenant did not leave the premises clean or remove rubbish as required by law.
A tenant was ordered by the Tenancy Tribunal to pay rent arrears and damages for leaving the rental unit in poor condition. The decision is based on photographic evidence showing excessive rubbish and overgrown grass, along with proof of unpaid rent.
In this case, a tenant requested to end their one-year fixed term rental agreement early due to financial difficulties caused by setting up a business at the property. The Tenancy Tribunal denied the request and ordered the tenant to pay outstanding rent and other charges.
A tenant requested a rehearing from the Tenancy Tribunal after being ordered to compensate another tenant for damage caused by a UV lightbulb. The Tribunal dismissed this request because it found that the original decision was based on accepted evidence and there were no substantial wrongs or miscarriages of justice.
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that a tenant must pay $425 for cleaning costs after a dispute with the landlord over the amount. The decision was based on the requirement under section 40(1)(e) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, which mandates tenants to leave premises reasonably clean and tidy at the end of tenancy.
In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal ruled that a person must pay a a person $21,025 for unpaid levies and related costs. The decision supports the right of a person corporates to recover reasonable expenses from a person under the a person Titles Act.
In this Tenancy Tribunal case, the court ruled that the tenant must leave the property as per the termination notice and pay outstanding rent and damages to the landlord.
In a dispute before the Tenancy Tribunal, the landlord successfully claimed damages from the tenant for cleaning, rubbish removal, repairs, lawn work, and carpet replacement beyond fair wear and tear. The tribunal ruled in favour of the landlord based on evidence provided during the hearing.
In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal found that a tenant was responsible for paying damages to the rental property beyond normal wear and tear, as well as reasonable cleaning fees when leaving the premises at the end of their tenancy. The landlord successfully recovered these costs from the bond and ordered additional payments.
In this case, the Supreme Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal a decision by the Tenancy Tribunal and a complaint about the deletion of judicial review proceedings. The court ruled that there is no right to appeal from the Tenancy Tribunal and administrative issues do not qualify as decisions subject to appeal.