VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages

Case No. [2026] NZTT 5452269

📌 In brief

A tenant was ordered by the Tenancy Tribunal to pay rent arrears and damages for leaving the rental unit in poor condition. The decision is based on photographic evidence showing excessive rubbish and overgrown grass, along with proof of unpaid rent.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is responsible for rent arrears, damage beyond fair wear and tear, and leaving premises in a clean condition at the end of tenancy.

Topics

rent arrearsdamage to property

Provisions

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 40(2)(a)Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 49B

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.40

This section outlines a tenant's responsibilities, including paying rent on time, keeping the property reasonably clean and tidy, and leaving it in a clean condition with all rubbish removed when the tenancy ends.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The claimant successfully recovered rent arrears and damages from the respondent.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered a tenant to pay rent arrears, compensate for damage beyond fair wear and tear, and leave the premises clean at the end of tenancy. The landlord provided evidence of unpaid rent and property damage.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5452269 1

[2026] NZTT 5452269

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: Unit/[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. [RESPONDENT] must pay [APPELLANT[NAME] $2,189.75 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below.

2. The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $248.00 (5338260-002) to [NAME]– [APPELLANT[NAME] immediately.

Description Landlord Rent arrears $876.00 Repairs: holes in walls $201.75 Repairs: bathroom cabinet $100.00 Repairs: toilet roll holder $10.00 Rubbish removal $450.00 Lawns and Garden work $800.00 Total award $2,437.75 Bond $248.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $2,189.75

Reasons:

1. The landlord attended the video hearing.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5452269 2

2. The landlord has applied for rent arrears, compensation and refund of the bond, following the end of the tenancy.

How much is owed for rent?

3. The tenancy ended on 28 January 2026. The landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

4. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and remove all rubbish. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

5. The landlord provided photographic evidence that the tenant left behind a number of discarded items inside and outside. The amount claimed was not consistent with the photographic evidence and a fair sum has been awarded for the number of items visible in the photographs.

6. The photographic evidence was that the section was very overgrown. It looked like the grass had not been cut in many weeks, if not months. After discussion and consideration, the Tribunal accepts that the amount claimed is reasonable.

7. The amounts ordered are proved.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

8. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.

9. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.

10. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.

11. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5452269 3

applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.

12. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. [NAME] v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.

13. The following damage was caused during the tenancy:

a. The carpet was damaged beyond repair by staining.

b. There were holes in the walls of the hallway, bedroom 2, bedroom 4, the bathroom and the garage.

c. The bathroom wall cabinet and a toilet roll holder were missing.

14. The landlord had no evidence that the carpet was less than ten years’ old. Its value had therefore depreciated to nil and so no the landlord’s claim must fail.

15. The remaining damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.

16. The amounts ordered are proved.

17. I have considered betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations and should not be better or worse off. I have reduced the amounts claimed for the bathroom cabinet and toilet roll holder to reflect an estimated depreciation value for these items.

[NAME]

29 May 2026

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5452269 4

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is

less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the

work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5452269 5

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Tenant is responsible for rent arrears.
  • Tenant must keep the property reasonably clean and tidy.
  • Tenant liable for damage beyond fair wear and tear if unable to prove otherwise.
  • Tenant required to pay costs incurred by landlord due to damage or excessive mess upon vacating.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenant was ordered to pay rent arrears and damages for leaving the rental unit in poor condition.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on photographic evidence showing excessive rubbish and overgrown grass, along with proof of unpaid rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 40(2)(a) and 49B of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The photographic evidence showing poor condition at the end of tenancy was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

It was in favour of the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Tenants should ensure they leave rental units clean and tidy, and pay all rent on time.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographic evidence showing poor condition at the end of tenancy was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, but only if there is substantial wrong or new evidence available.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It's advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.