VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages

Case No. [2026] NZTT 5407269

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal ruled in favour of a landlord who had filed for rent arrears and damages due to non-compliance at the end of tenancy. The tenant was ordered to pay $840.90, which includes costs related to rubbish removal and repairs.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is liable for rent arrears, rubbish removal costs, and repair expenses if they do not comply with their obligations at the end of a tenancy.

Topics

rent arrearsproperty damage

Provisions

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 40(1)(e), (ca)Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 49B

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.40

This section outlines a tenant's responsibilities, including paying rent on time, keeping the property reasonably clean and tidy, and removing all their belongings and rubbish when they move out.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The claimant was awarded rent arrears and compensation for damage to the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered a tenant to pay $840.90 for rent arrears, rubbish removal costs, and repair expenses due to non-compliance at the end of tenancy. The claimant provided evidence showing that the tenant did not remove all rubbish or replace worn-out smoke alarm batteries as required by law.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407269 1

[2026] NZTT 5407269

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. [RESPONDENT] must pay [APPELLANT] [NAME] $840.90 immediately, being rent arrears to 21 October 2025.

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears $113.57 Rubbish removal $358.50 Repairs: Glass window living room $368.83 Total award $840.90 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $840.90

Reasons:

1. The Landlord attended the hearing. The Tenant did not appear.

2. The landlord has applied for rent arrears and compensation.

How much is owed for rent arrears?

3. The tenancy ended on 21 October 2025. The landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407269 2

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

4. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant is required to replace worn out smoke alarm batteries during the tenancy. See section 40(1)(ca) Residential Tenancies Act 1986. The tenant must also replace standard light bulbs.

5. The tenant did not remove all rubbish. The rubbish left behind included rubbish in the Council wheelie bins, a couch and compost waste. An exit report and invoice were provided to show the rubbish left behind and substantiate the costs.

6. The amounts ordered are proved.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

7. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.

8. Where the damage is careless, and occurs after 27 August 2019, section 49B RTA applies. If the landlord becomes aware of the damage after 27 August, the damage is presumed to have occurred after that date unless the tenant proves otherwise.

9. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.

10. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.

11. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407269 3

12. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. [NAME] v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.

13. The following damage was caused during the tenancy: Cracked lounge window. Entry and exit inspection reports were provided to show the damaged occurred during the tenancy. An invoice was provided to substantiate the claim. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.

14. The amounts ordered are proved.

15. I have taken into account betterment and depreciation. The landlord should be returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and should not be better or worse off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan.

[NAME]

05 June 2026

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407269 4

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is

less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the

work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407269 5

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Tenant is liable for rent arrears.
  • Tenant must leave the property reasonably clean and tidy.
  • Tenant responsible for damage beyond fair wear and tear.
  • Tenant must comply with reasonable conditions set by the landlord regarding pets, etc.
  • Tenant liable for repair expenses if they do not comply with their obligations at the end of a tenancy.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that a tenant must pay rent arrears, rubbish removal costs, and repair expenses.

Who was involved?

A landlord brought the case against a tenant for non-compliance at the end of tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on evidence showing that the tenant failed to remove rubbish and replace smoke alarm batteries as required by law.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 40(1)(e), (ca) and 49B of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The claimant argued that the tenant did not comply with their obligations at the end of tenancy, leading to damage and additional costs.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Tenants should ensure they comply with their obligations at the end of tenancy to avoid financial penalties.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Rent records, exit reports, and invoices were provided as evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, both parties can appeal within 10 working days using the appropriate form.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for specific guidance.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.