Application for lease extension struck out for being late
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal struck out an application for a lease extension because it was submitted too late. Under the Leasehold Reform Act 1993, applications must be made within six months of receiving a counter-notice.
⚖️ Legal holding
An applicant must submit an application for a lease extension within six months of receiving a counter-notice.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction due to the application being submitted out of time.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal struck out an application for a lease extension as it was submitted after the statutory deadline of six months from the receipt of a counter-notice. The application was deemed invalid under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Struck Out
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference
: CAM/33UG/OLR/2025/0021
Property : 63 [RESPONDENT], Norwich, [POSTCODE]
Applicants : [redacted] : [NAME]
Respondent: [redacted] : [RESPONDENT] of Application : For determination of the premium and
terms of a new lease-Leasehold Reform,
Housing and Urban Development Act 1993
Tribunal Member : Judge MacQueen
Date of Decision : 15 July 2025
DECISION
Background
1. On 27 February 2025 the Tribunal received an email from the Applicants’ representative that stated: “please see enclosed an application concerning a lease extension on behalf of our clients…”’. However, the did not have an attachment.
2. The Tribunal wrote to the Applicants’ representative on 4 March 2025 to confirm that there were no attachments sent with the email. In reply, the Applicants’ representative set an email on 4 March which included an application. The Tribunal also received a copy of the application by post on 3 March 2024.
3. On 11 June 2025, the Tribunal wrote to both parties confirming the Tribunal received the application on 4 March 2025. This was a misprint and the application should have been noted as received on 3 March 2025, but that does not have any bearing on this decision.
4. On 18 June 2025, the [NAME] wrote to the Tribunal by email submitting that as the application was not sent to the Tribunal until 4
2 March 2025, the application was out of time. The Respondent’s representative stated that the counter notice was dated 29 August 2024, meaning that 28 February 2025 was the last date on which the application could be submitted.
5. The Applicants’ representative wrote to the Tribunal on 26 June 2025 confirming their agreement that the relevant date by which an application to the tribunal could be made was 28 February 2025. However, they stated that their email of 27 February 2025 was made in time.
The Tribunal’s Decision
6. Section 48 (2) of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 provides that any application under subsection (1) must be made not later than the end of the period of six months beginning with the date on which the counter-notice or further counter-notice was given to the tenant. There is no power under the Act for the Tribunal to extend this deadline.
7. In this case, the counter notice was dated 29 August 2025, meaning that the last date for an application to be received by the tribunal was 28 February 2025.
8. The Tribunal did not received the application until 3 March 2025. The Applicants’ representative’s email of 27 February 2025 did not have an application form attached.
9. In the circumstances, the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine this matter and must therefore strike the application out under Rule 9(2)(a) of The Tribunal Procedure (First tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013
Judge Bernadette MacQueen
Date: 15 July 2025
3
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), on a point of law only, then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Claimant Successfully Obtains Right to Manage Property Despite Procedural I…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) RTM Company Granted Dispensation for Urgent Electrical Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Urgent Lift Repairs Dispensation in First-tier Tribunal Ca…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Freeholder to Vary Leases for Sinking Fund and I…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Works on Residential Estate
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The deadline for submitting an application under the Act is strictly six months from when the counter-notice was given.
- The Respondent correctly identified that the last possible date to submit the application was 28 February 2025.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The Applicants' email on 27 February without an attached application form did not meet the requirement of submitting a complete and valid application by the deadline.
- The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to extend the six-month time limit for applications under the Act.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to strike out the application for a lease extension as it was submitted out of time.
Who was involved?
The tenant applied for a lease extension, while the landlord responded to the application.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to strike out the application because it was submitted after the six-month deadline set by the Leasehold Reform Act 1993.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, specifically section 48(2), was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the application was submitted after the six-month deadline.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their application for a lease extension is submitted within the six-month deadline.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The dates of the emails and the counter-notice were crucial in determining whether the application was submitted in time.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law only.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving lease extensions.
