
Benefits & Welfare judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Upper Tribunal decided that a Housing Benefit overpayment was not recoverable because the Council made an official error by providing unclear information about reporting absences abroad. The Tribunal found that the claimant was not at fault and could not reasonably have known that his absence would affect his benefit.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal where a former Royal Marine challenged the reduction of his war pension disablement assessment. The Tribunal made an error in excluding evidence created after the initial decision, leading to a remittal for rehearing.
The Upper Tribunal overturned a lower court's decision because it lacked sufficient details and explanations. The case will now be heard by a new panel.
The Upper Tribunal decided that the UK remained the a person for a dual a person's carer's allowance claim despite his a person. The ruling was based on Regulation (EC) No. 883/2004 and the a person Withdrawal Agreement.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal, finding the First-tier Tribunal made an error by not considering the claimant's initial telephone call to the Department for Work and Pensions as a valid claim for universal credit. The case was sent back for reconsideration.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal, finding the First-tier Tribunal made an error in its decision regarding the capital disregard for a rented property. The Secretary of State must reasonably extend the capital disregard period if the claimant has taken steps to regain possession of the property within six months.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal regarding a Universal Credit claim and ordered a new hearing because there was insufficient evidence to support the claimant's condition.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal and remanded a Personal Independence Payment case due to procedural irregularities, highlighting the need for fairness in proceedings.
The Upper Tribunal reviewed a claimant's eligibility for housing costs under Universal Credit. The claimant argued that he was liable to pay rent for his accommodation, but the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the arrangement did not meet the criteria for a commercial liability to pay rent.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against a Pensions Appeal Tribunal decision, finding that the latter failed to consider the correct statutory framework for reviewing an interim assessment of disablement. The case involved war pensions and armed forces compensation.