
Employment Law judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
An employment tribunal ruled that a worker was unfairly dismissed and awarded compensation, but also found that the worker contributed to their own dismissal. The employer failed to follow proper disciplinary procedures as outlined by ACAS, leading to an increase in the compensatory award.
A worker's case against their employer for unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages, and holiday pay was dismissed by an Employment Tribunal because the claims were not made in time. The Tribunal ruled that it was possible to make these claims within the required timeframe but the worker did not do so.
An Employment Tribunal ruled that while the worker did not prove unfair dismissal, they were entitled to receive payment for unused holiday days at the end of their job. The employer must pay this amount as required by UK employment law.
The Employment Tribunal awarded a protective award to the claimant after finding that the employer did not follow the correct procedures when making redundancies involving more than 20 employees. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to collective redundancy laws to avoid financial penalties.
In a case brought by an employee against a major retailer for race and sex discrimination, the Employment Tribunal in Leeds ruled against the claimant. The judge concluded that the incidents did not involve any discriminatory motives based on race or gender.
An employment tribunal dismissed a worker’s case for disability discrimination and harassment because it was filed too late. The court ruled that complaints must be made within strict time limits set by law, even if they relate to ongoing issues.
The Employment Tribunal ruled that the employer must pay a protective award to workers who were dismissed as redundant without proper consultation. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to legal requirements during redundancy processes.
In this case, an Employment Tribunal ruled in favour of a worker's unfair dismissal claim and their failure to provide written particulars of employment claim. However, disability discrimination and unlawful deduction from wages claims were dismissed. The decision highlights the importance of providing clear reasons for dismissals and adhering to employment law requirements.
An employment tribunal dismissed a worker’s case because they did not show up for the scheduled hearing on April 22, 2025. This highlights how crucial it is for individuals involved in legal proceedings to attend their court dates.
In this case, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claims brought by the claimants because they did not have at least two years of continuous employment with their employer as required by law.
In this case, the Employment Tribunal found in favour of the worker who claimed they were unfairly dismissed and discriminated against due to their sex when denied a promotion opportunity. However, other complaints about harassment and further instances of discrimination were not upheld.
An Employment Tribunal dismissed the worker's claims of discrimination against their employer due to non-payment of a required deposit, emphasising the importance of adhering to procedural rules in employment disputes.
In an Employment Tribunal case, a worker's claim for unpaid wages was successful. However, her complaints about disability discrimination and harassment were dismissed as they had no reasonable chance of winning.
In this case, the Employment Tribunal ruled that while a person was a self-employed contractor for a person, he acted as an agent of a person when supervising the claimant's training. The court found that a person had knowingly delegated its supervisory duties to a person.
An Employment Tribunal ruled that an employer unlawfully deducted wages from an employee’s salary due to damage to a company vehicle. The tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence to prove the employee caused the damage, thus ruling in favour of the employee.
In this case, an employee brought a claim against their employer for unfair dismissal at the Employment Tribunal. The judge ruled in favour of the employee, finding that they were unfairly dismissed and awarded them compensation.